Accountability

Senate bill would increase oversight of clearance process

capitol dome

A bipartisan group of senators have introduced legislation that would make it easier to fire federal workers and debar contractors involved in misconduct concerning security clearance investigations, while providing a funding stream for investigations into such misconduct.

The Security Clearance Oversight and Reform Enhancement (SCORE) Act, sponsored by Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), arose from a recent Senate hearing at which it was revealed that the firm that conducted the background investigation into NSA leaker Edward Snowden is the target of a federal probe. Additionally, the Office of the Inspector General for the Office of Personnel Management, which is conducting the investigation, has to scrape together funding because it is not allowed access to OPM's revolving fund, into which agencies requiring background checks for employees must pay.

The SCORE Act allows the OPM IG to use money from the revolving fund for audits, investigations and oversight of security clearance process. The bill also permits the firing or debarment of individuals working on clearance investigations if a "preponderance of the evidence," indicates their involvement with fraud, report falsification, failure to review a report, abuse of authority, or impersonating a federal officer in the conduct of a background investigation.

Finally, the bill requires the director of national intelligence to submit guidance to all federal agencies about which positions require an employee to possess a security clearance, and to review those classifications as duties change.

"Recent events force us to take a close look at what the federal government is doing in the name of national security and how well we are protecting classified information," said Tester, who heads the Subcommittee on Federal Programs and the Federal Workforce. "This bill gives investigators the tools they need to hold folks accountable and protect our national security."

The four senators also sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office seeking information on whether the Department of Defense, the Performance and Accountability Council (a counterintelligence group involved in setting standards for vetting federal employees and contractors) and OPM are on the same page when it comes to clearance standards, and to find out if those standards can be harmonized.

The legislators also want GAO to report on whether standards used by investigators are up to date and complete, how the quality of those investigations is tracked, and what sorts of action agencies have taken against employees or contractors for poorly conducted investigations.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy, health IT and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mr. Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian started his career as an arts reporter and critic, and has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, Architect magazine, and other publications. He was an editorial assistant and staff writer at the now-defunct New York Press and arts editor at the About.com online network in the 1990s, and was a weekly contributor of music and film reviews to the Washington Times from 2007 to 2014.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.


The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Wed, Jul 17, 2013

Exactly! I'm voting for the candidate who's platform is, I will vote NO, on any new laws that impede liberty and will repeal at least 3 laws for every new one! Each law chips away another piece of our liberty.

Fri, Jul 12, 2013

Here it comes. I believe that people that share classified material (except the President i.e. Jimmy Carter) can be prosecuted. I also believe that companies can already be debared. Why do we need more redundant laws? Is it so Senators can be perceived as actually doing something? Snowden can be prosecuted and federal employees can be terminated. All it takes is a will to do it. If more laws are going to be added then repeal the current laws that don’t seem to work. I will say that I am more likely to vote for a Senator or Congressman that campaigns on blocking so many new laws that one that campaigns on a platform that “I got this law passed and this one, and this one, and this one….”

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group