Cybersecurity

Is piecemeal the right approach to cyber legislation?

Capitol Dome

Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) is among the legislators who want to talk cybersecurity legislation "in bite-sized chunks."

The various cybersecurity bills proposed last year shared a couple of traits: They all took a fairly comprehensive approach to addressing a number of aspects of a complex issue, and none became law.

This year has seen a different approach targeting specific areas -- in particular, those that enjoy at least some degree of consensus. One key lawmaker said that is the better way to go if cyber legislation is to be enacted anytime soon.

"We've been frozen legislatively for years, not being able to do anything. So let's not try to do everything. Let's take it in bite-size chunks and make some advancement," Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) said July 30 at the AFCEA Global Intelligence Forum in Washington. "I think there is enough concern about cyber in both parties that there is a chance to do it. I'm not saying it's going to be easy, but the more focus we take in these bite-size chunks we have, the better chance we'll have."

Thornberry, while taking some swipes at the Senate, praised progress made in recent days on a new cyber information-sharing bill marked up by the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, led by bill sponsor Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.).

"I think that's a huge step forward. It's a major advance if we can get the Senate to look at discrete, bite-size chunks rather than trying to do everything at once," said Thornberry, who is chairman of the Armed Services Committee's Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee and is also a member of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. "The truth is, there is a bunch of this stuff that everybody agrees Congress ought to do, but then we get balled up on regulation and details of some of these issues. Keep working on those differences, but let's work on the stuff everyone agrees on," such as information sharing and an overhaul of the Federal Information Security Management Act.

As hopeful as Thornberry might be, the self-described optimist acknowledged that actually passing any cybersecurity bill remains an iffy proposition.

"Legislatively, we're on a better, certainly more hopeful, track," he said. "At the same time, we have to pay attention to the environment we're in. The current [National Security Agency] leak means there's not going to be a cyber bill that comes to the floor in the immediate future, although September is possible."

Beyond cyber-specific legislation, Thornberry said other efforts are underway on the Hill to address cybersecurity. He said members have been getting educated by senior Defense Department and intelligence community officials to better understand the threat landscape, and various committees have been collaborating on the issue.

That cooperation means a designated "cyber committee" is unlikely, Thornberry noted.

"I do think cyber has gotten elevated to the point where...[we have] this kind of task force drawing on nine different committees," he said. "It's not the ideal way to work every day, but on the other hand, cyber so permeates everything that we do that [we] can't make a cyber committee. So, we have these cross-cutting bodies...to develop a body of expertise," which then is taken back to other committees and members and shared throughout Congress.

Congress also is looking beyond the Hill -- specifically, across the river to the Pentagon, where the future of the U.S. Cyber Command is set for reevaluation. Cyber Command, led by dual-hatted NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander, is a sub-unified command under the U.S. Strategic Command. Some have argued that its status should be elevated.

"We require in this year's [House defense authorization bill] an independent assessment of the organizational structure for Cyber Command and moving ahead, looking at options," Thornberry said. "My guess is Cyber Command is not going to remain a sub-unified command under Stratcom or anybody else in the future. The harder question is whether NSA and Cyber Command will continue to be under the same individual."

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Thu, Aug 1, 2013

Most legislation should be generally piecemeal because when you start grouping all sorts of other items together you get bad parts included that the majority know it is not right to do, but accept them because they want the rest of the package.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group