Administration

White House argues for Syria intervention on microsite

Map of Syrian chemical weapon attacks from the White House microsite

The new White House microsite explaining why the rationale for action against Syria includes this map of reported chemical weapons attacks.

As President Barack Obama stumped for international support for military strikes on Syria at the G20 Summit in Russia, the White House released a dedicated website designed to explain the rationale for action to the American public.

The site launched as Congress debates a resolution authorizing military action in the face of what lawmakers from both parties say is overwhelming opposition coming via constituent phone calls.

The White House site aggregates administration statements on the issue, from a declassified report that lays the blame for an Aug. 21 chemical attack on the Syrian government, to documents such as readouts of calls with foreign leaders that typically don't circulate beyond journalists' in-boxes.

Visitors are invited to "explore this page to learn more about President Obama's response to the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons in Syria and get the latest news from the White House about the situation."

The site does not urge visitors to contact their Member of Congress in support of military strikes. Instead, it stresses that intervention wouldn't involve ground troops, and puts forth the policy goal of deterring other regimes and groups from using chemical weapons in the future.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy, health IT and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mr. Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial roles at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian started his career as an arts reporter and critic, and has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, Architect magazine, and other publications. He was an editorial assistant and staff writer at the now-defunct New York Press and arts editor at the About.com online network in the 1990s, and was a weekly contributor of music and film reviews to the Washington Times from 2007 to 2014.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.


Rising Stars

Meet 21 early-career leaders who are doing great things in federal IT.

Featured

  • SEC Chairman Jay Clayton

    SEC owns up to 2016 breach

    A key database of financial information was breached in 2016, possibly in support of insider trading, said the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DOD looks to get aggressive about cloud adoption

    Defense leaders and Congress are looking to encourage more aggressive cloud policies and prod reluctant agencies to embrace experimentation and risk-taking.

  • Shutterstock / Pictofigo

    The next big thing in IT procurement

    Steve Kelman talks to the agencies that have embraced tech demos in their acquisition efforts -- and urges others in government to give it a try.

  • broken lock

    DHS bans Kaspersky from federal systems

    The Department of Homeland Security banned the Russian cybersecurity company Kaspersky Lab’s products from federal agencies in a new binding operational directive.

  • man planning layoffs

    USDA looks to cut CIOs as part of reorg

    The Department of Agriculture is looking to cut down on the number of agency CIOs in the name of efficiency and better communication across mission areas.

  • What's next for agency cyber efforts?

    Ninety days after the Trump administration's executive order, FCW sat down with agency cyber leaders to discuss what’s changing.

Reader comments

Fri, Sep 6, 2013

This is the same intelligence community that assured president Bust that Iraq had WMD. And we are now supposed to believe them. Heck maybe they were right all along and these weapons supposedly used recently were the WMD's that were in Iraq till the US intervention in 2003? Who knows, but I would be very wary of their "convincing" evidence. Go very slowly on this.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group