Government Shutdown

What's the worst that could happen?

locked doors

If Congress can't come up with a way to continue funding the federal government by Oct. 1, some experts say many people won't notice much, at least right away.

But after a few days, many more will. So, what's the worst-case scenario for a shutdown?

Imagine the National Institutes of Health not being able to admit new patients, important IT contracts stalled and up to 800,000 employees furloughed with Congress electing not to provide back pay, said John Palguta, a former federal executive and now vice president of policy at the Partnership for Public Service.

Then imagine it lasting a few weeks or longer.

Palguta and his wife, both former feds – he at the Merit Systems Protection Board and she at the Commerce Department – were furloughed in a 21-day shutdown in 1996.

Related Coverage

See all of FCW's shutdown stories

Federal IT systems are larger, more complex and require significantly more manpower than they did in the 1990s – even small security or accessibility issues could be magnified greatly during a shutdown of any significant duration.

"A shutdown is just a horrible way to run government and bad things happen, but the worst-case scenario is a shutdown takes place over any significant length of time," Palguta said. "The pressure would be immense after a few days."

Personnel and programs necessary for critical services are supposed to be exempt from furloughs or cancelation per federal law, and OMB has issued guidance to agencies in the midst of planning for a potential shutdown. Yet Palguta said furloughing employees or canceling programs or contracts deemed "non-essential" is likely to lead to significant problems in a variety of areas where the government provides customer service, citing student loan processing as an example.

"It was nerve-wracking as an employee, when you don't know when you're coming back," Palguta said, noting that non-excepted feds could go out and get other jobs if necessary during a shutdown.

But the longer it goes, the worse it could be for average Americans who don't work for the government but depend on it for their economic well being.

"The worst-case scenario is that a shutdown lasts through the debt ceiling issue. A shutdown might be disastrous for the lives of many government contractors and federal employees, but a breach of the debt ceiling would have a national economic impact," said Kevin Plexico, vice president for information services at Deltek.

Contractors already faced the burden of dividing their last days of certainty between managing end-of-the-fiscal-year contracting options and deciding what IT contracts might be shut down, stopped or extended, according to Mark Forman, former administrator for e-government and IT at the Office of Management and Budget.

"The people supposed to be making all this work are the same people working on contingency plans in determining who stays on, what contractors are cut, and the capacity really isn't there in the procurement workforce," said Forman. "In a worst-case scenario, neither gets done well."

Cyber- and cloud-security isn't supposed to be at-risk during a shutdown, according to several high-ranking IT professionals interviewed by FCW, because those mission-critical federal network defenders are supposed to be exempt from furloughs as well. Yet as James Lewis, director and senior fellow of the Technology and Public Policy Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told FCW, every agency will make their own determinations about which employees to send home.

"It's every network for itself around here," Lewis said.

About the Author

Frank Konkel is a former staff writer for FCW.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.


  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Tue, Oct 1, 2013 RayW

When you have 'leaders' (Obama, Reed, Pelosi, Boehner, etc) who can not lead but just make threats to each other, this is what happens.

But having worked in Real Life for 18 years before going Gov, I learned to keep a 6 month bank account to tide me over in times of layoffs (and yes, often in Real Life they lay you off then hire you back when the work/funding is there), too many Gov workers live pay check to pay check though.

Too bad we can not make the president, the house, the senate, and all their staff suffer with the workers, but that is the problem with allowing the people who fund the payroll define what they get paid and when.

Tue, Oct 1, 2013

We are already funding health care for everyone, now that companies have to flip the bill too, makes them want to not do it. The middle class Americans, have always been flipping the bill for everyone even the rich cause they use every loop hole even the illegal ones to not pay ther fair taxation. So what is new nothing more then playing with peoples lives and not wanting to pay there fair share. Just take all of Congress and Senate money away and see how fast they can figure it out, I mean no under the table money from lobbist and all those companies that have them by the ball, pardon the pun but it is true.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group