Management

Feds should formalize architecture, chief architect says

data abstract

Public or private sector, every agency and organization has an enterprise architecture, and the federal government's chief enterprise architect believes these strategic plans should be formalized to improve the government's ability to share services between agencies.

"Architecture is nothing if not applied," said Federal Chief Enterprise Architect Scott Bernard, speaking at a conference Oct. 29 in Washington.

Enterprise architecture has gained steam in federal agencies since a 2012 White House directive mandated agency heads to create agency-wide enterprise architectures that meld strategic drivers, business requirements and technology in hopes of reducing duplication and enhancing engagement between agencies and the public sector.

And its importance continues to grow, Bernard said.

Enterprise architecture, which Bernard defined simply as the combination of strategic, business and technology planning, plays a major role in several key agency-wide initiatives. PortfolioStat, the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative, the White House's digital strategy and cloud computing could all yield better results when run by agencies with sound enterprise architectures in place, he said.

And, unlike many processes in IT, Bernard said agencies should not operate with more than one enterprise architecture. This is one time, he said, when you don't want a backup.

"Centralized or decentralized, [agencies] should not be using competing architectures," Bernard said.

The government has room to improve in using enterprise architecture to promote shared services, with the first step simply accepting it as a priority, Bernard said.

It makes little sense for agencies to have multiple e-mail systems, IT help desks and different methodologies and systems to deliver accounting, travel or finance services. Yet those "low-hanging fruit" are still hanging in many agency trees.

"I think we can be more efficient with a few instances, but it requires agencies to be aware – they have to understand shared services is a priority and pursue it," Bernard said.

About the Author

Frank Konkel is a former staff writer for FCW.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Wed, Oct 30, 2013 OccupyIT

Well if you can't say you're essential its hard to justify your job, right? Unfortunately, most enterprise architectures have little practical impact on the organization (besides unintended consequences) and are outward reporting requirements to another navel gazing comittee. They also are pretty much still wrestling with the most mundane back office functions which should have been resolved eons ago. Very few even consider the real Program level activity of the Agency that is what matters to constituents and taxpayers. Let's say you won't get your bonus if you're still trying to describe you email system or accounting as 'enterprise'. Call a GS-11 and ask them how the ridiculously expensive Enterprise Architecture Club has improved their lives and work. And, no, BYOD isn't it.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group