Defense

McChrystal: U.S. not ready for cyberwar

futuristic cyberwar

It may not be news that the cyber domain is perhaps the most vulnerable point for U.S. defenses, but when the former top commander in Afghanistan says we're not ready for cyber war, it reinforces the quandary facing the U.S. military, civilian agencies and the private sector alike.

Military-wise, it is hard to tell how prepared the Pentagon is for cyber war – information is tightly locked down under high-level classifications – but there are a wide array of other mitigating factors that contribute to vulnerability, according to Gen. Stanley McChrystal, former commander of U.S. and international forces-Afghanistan.

"I don’t think we're prepared for the future because I think it's almost impossible to be," McChrystal said Oct. 29 at an event held by SAP National Security Services in Falls Church, Va. "In the case of cyberspace, I think our big problem is that we are going to try to balance the amazing capacity to monitor and control, with the desire of people to have privacy, freedom of action, freedom of communication. That’s going to be a very careful balance, and we're going to get stuck a few times."

When asked about his thoughts on cyber warfare, McChrystal did not specifically mention the National Security Agency or its chief, Gen. Keith Alexander, but he alluded to ongoing controversy over NSA surveillance activities and pointed out that successfully weighing civil liberties against the terror threat is a pressing challenge happening in real time.

"Al Qaeda used the Internet incredibly effectively against us, and the more open it is, the more they'll do that. But there's that balance to find between what you're able to do and what people are willing to accept," he said. "We're seeing that play out in the papers today."

A day later Alexander spoke at a Bloomberg Government event Washington, and while most of his time was spent discussing the NSA, he also emphasized what he characterized as priorities in U.S. cyber defense. Among them were calls for a more defensible architecture, better threat-sharing information and continued transition to "a thin, virtual cloud" that allows rapid response to potential threats.

"A mistake in cyberspace means that the adversary has a chance of getting into our networks," Alexander said. Action "can't be at the speed of people; it has to be at the speed of the network."

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.