Defense

McChrystal: U.S. not ready for cyberwar

futuristic cyberwar

It may not be news that the cyber domain is perhaps the most vulnerable point for U.S. defenses, but when the former top commander in Afghanistan says we're not ready for cyber war, it reinforces the quandary facing the U.S. military, civilian agencies and the private sector alike.

Military-wise, it is hard to tell how prepared the Pentagon is for cyber war – information is tightly locked down under high-level classifications – but there are a wide array of other mitigating factors that contribute to vulnerability, according to Gen. Stanley McChrystal, former commander of U.S. and international forces-Afghanistan.

"I don’t think we're prepared for the future because I think it's almost impossible to be," McChrystal said Oct. 29 at an event held by SAP National Security Services in Falls Church, Va. "In the case of cyberspace, I think our big problem is that we are going to try to balance the amazing capacity to monitor and control, with the desire of people to have privacy, freedom of action, freedom of communication. That’s going to be a very careful balance, and we're going to get stuck a few times."

When asked about his thoughts on cyber warfare, McChrystal did not specifically mention the National Security Agency or its chief, Gen. Keith Alexander, but he alluded to ongoing controversy over NSA surveillance activities and pointed out that successfully weighing civil liberties against the terror threat is a pressing challenge happening in real time.

"Al Qaeda used the Internet incredibly effectively against us, and the more open it is, the more they'll do that. But there's that balance to find between what you're able to do and what people are willing to accept," he said. "We're seeing that play out in the papers today."

A day later Alexander spoke at a Bloomberg Government event Washington, and while most of his time was spent discussing the NSA, he also emphasized what he characterized as priorities in U.S. cyber defense. Among them were calls for a more defensible architecture, better threat-sharing information and continued transition to "a thin, virtual cloud" that allows rapid response to potential threats.

"A mistake in cyberspace means that the adversary has a chance of getting into our networks," Alexander said. Action "can't be at the speed of people; it has to be at the speed of the network."

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    Shutterstock photo id 669226093 By Gorodenkoff

    The disinformation game

    The federal government is poised to bring new tools and strategies to bear in the fight against foreign-backed online disinformation campaigns, but how and when they choose to act could have ramifications on the U.S. political ecosystem.

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.