Oversight

NIST to review cryptographic standards development process

documentation

The National Institute of Standards and Technology will review its methods for developing cryptographic standards following the controversy stirred by leaked documents that highlighted efforts by the National Security Agency to subvert NIST'S work.

The agency, which sets guidelines, policy and standards for computer systems in the federal government and worldwide, has initiated a formal review in an effort to build back public trust.

"Trust is crucial to the adoption of strong cryptographic algorithms," the agency said in a statement. "To ensure that our guidance has been developed according the highest standard of inclusiveness, transparency and security, NIST has initiated a formal review of our standards development efforts. We are compiling our goals and objectives, principles of operation, processes for identifying cryptographic algorithms for standardization, methods for reviewing and resolving public comments, and other important procedures necessary for a rigorous process."

Once the review is over, the public cryptographic community and an as-yet unselected independent organization will have a chance to comment on the process before NIST makes permanent changes to its process. The agency will also review existing cryptographic standards; should any official guidance not meet the agency's revamped standard, NIST plans to address the issues immediately.

A NIST spokesperson told FCW the agency has not yet set a timeline for the process, but said its importance mandates it be done right.

"Our mission is to protect the nation's IT infrastructure and information through strong cryptography," agency officials said in a statement. "We cannot carry out that mission without the trust and assistance of the world's cryptographic experts. We're committed to continually earning that trust."

NSA's meddling was brought to light in early September through documents leaked by former agency contractor Edward Snowden. The documents showed that NSA deliberately weakened encryption standards in Special Publication 800-90A and draft Special Publications 800-90B and 800-90C.

When the leaks surfaced, about 70 government vendors used the standards. NIST quickly recommended against any organization using the standards, which contained an algorithm called the Deterministic Random Bit Generator that was long-rumored to contain weaknesses known to the NSA.

About the Author

Frank Konkel is a former staff writer for FCW.

FCW in Print

In the latest issue: Looking back on three decades of big stories in federal IT.

Featured

  • Anne Rung -- Commerce Department Photo

    Exit interview with Anne Rung

    The government's departing top acquisition official said she leaves behind a solid foundation on which to build more effective and efficient federal IT.

  • Charles Phalen

    Administration appoints first head of NBIB

    The National Background Investigations Bureau announced the appointment of its first director as the agency prepares to take over processing government background checks.

  • Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)

    Senator: Rigid hiring process pushes millennials from federal work

    Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said agencies are missing out on younger workers because of the government's rigidity, particularly its protracted hiring process.

  • FCW @ 30 GPS

    FCW @ 30

    Since 1987, FCW has covered it all -- the major contracts, the disruptive technologies, the picayune scandals and the many, many people who make federal IT function. Here's a look back at six of the most significant stories.

  • Shutterstock image.

    A 'minibus' appropriations package could be in the cards

    A short-term funding bill is expected by Sept. 30 to keep the federal government operating through early December, but after that the options get more complicated.

  • Defense Secretary Ash Carter speaks at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco

    DOD launches new tech hub in Austin

    The DOD is opening a new Defense Innovation Unit Experimental office in Austin, Texas, while Congress debates legislation that could defund DIUx.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group