Innovation

Got awesome tech concepts? Call NASA

curiosity

Getting to Mars demands bright ideas. NASA's Innovative Advanced Concepts program aims to fund more of them.

If you have a visionary concept that could improve current approaches to NASA's aerospace objectives or enable new types of missions, the space agency may want to help fund it.

NASA's Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program is seeking proposals for "revolutionary concepts with the potential to transform aerospace endeavors."

The space agency wants to see proposals on visionary aerospace architecture, interesting systems or credible, executable mission concepts that have not been attempted before.

NIAC's portfolio encapsulates several technologies contributing to "innovations in human systems, sensing or imaging, revolutionary construction, autonomous exploration, and aerospace transportation," according to the agency. Past concept awardees have included the use of electromagnets to protect spacecraft from radiation and a solid-state air purifier with no moving parts.

This latest call for the first phase of NIAC proposals offers up to $100,000 for nine months of study to advance a concept. Phase 1 solicitation is a two-step process, with short proposals – up to three pages in length – due by Dec. 18. NASA will review them and invite select proposal creators to submit a longer proposal by March 2014. The number of available awards will depend on a proposal's strength and the availability of funding.

Phase 1 awardees may apply later for a NIAC phase 2 award, where selectees can receive up to $500,000 over two years to further their concepts.

"It's through visionary thinking that transformative ideas go from concept to reality," said Michael Gazarik, NASA's associate administrator for space technology. "Our NIAC program provides an onramp for early stage technology concepts to take seed and potentially create revolutionary new capabilities for space exploration that might one day change how we live and work as we explore the cosmos."

To learn more about the NIAC program and view the NASA Research announcement for the solicitation, visit http://www.nasa/gov/niac.

About the Author

Frank Konkel is a former staff writer for FCW.

The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.

Featured

  • Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a 2016 campaign event. Image: Shutterstock

    'Buy American' order puts procurement in the spotlight

    Some IT contractors are worried that the "buy American" executive order from President Trump could squeeze key innovators out of the market.

  • OMB chief Mick Mulvaney, shown here in as a member of Congress in 2013. (Photo credit Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

    White House taps old policies for new government makeover

    New guidance from OMB advises agencies to use shared services, GWACs and federal schedules for acquisition, and to leverage IT wherever possible in restructuring plans.

  • Shutterstock image (by Everett Historical): aerial of the Pentagon.

    What DOD's next CIO will have to deal with

    It could be months before the Defense Department has a new CIO, and he or she will face a host of organizational and operational challenges from Day One

  • USAF Gen. John Hyten

    General: Cyber Command needs new platform before NSA split

    U.S. Cyber Command should be elevated to a full combatant command as soon as possible, the head of Strategic Command told Congress, but it cannot be separated from the NSA until it has its own cyber platform.

  • Image from Shutterstock.

    DLA goes virtual

    The Defense Logistics Agency is in the midst of an ambitious campaign to eliminate its IT infrastructure and transition to using exclusively shared, hosted and virtual services.

  • Fed 100 logo

    The 2017 Federal 100

    The women and men who make up this year's Fed 100 are proof positive of what one person can make possibile in federal IT. Read on to learn more about each and every winner's accomplishments.

Reader comments

Tue, Nov 19, 2013

This is just churning from an agency that doesn't have the money to have a decent exploration program. If NASA would define a mission that everyone could get behind (asteroid isn't it apparently), then NASA would dole out money to invent the technoligies to accomplish that mission. To do otherwise is to waste taxpayer money inventing something that might not have a use. NASA must have money to burn (and yet many complain they don't have the money for the SLS). They need a mission supported by both political parties. The rest will take care of itself.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group