Hill turnover will affect federal IT community


Capitol Hill retirements are making regular news as the 2014 midterm campaigns get into full swing, and a picture is emerging of what the next Congress could look like, especially in terms of plum committee assignments.

The federal IT community will keenly experience the absence of Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) at the helm of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. After two terms as chairman and one as ranking member, the combative Issa will be handing over his gavel.

Issa is the public face of Republican efforts to investigate high-profile issues like the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and the targeting of right-leaning political advocacy groups by the IRS. But he has also taken the lead  on oversight of federal IT spending and policy.

He is continuing a push to have his stalled Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA), which he cosponsored with Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), become law in 2014. Issa is also a strong advocate for a bipartisan spending transparency measure called the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act, which originated in his committee and is being shepherded in the Senate by Virginia Democrat Mark Warner.

Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.) is next in line to take the gavel at Oversight in terms of seniority, assuming Republicans maintain control of the House. He’s taken a strong hand on issues such as federal real estate management as chairman of the Subcommittee on Government Operations, and expressed interest in taking over the full committee. If Mica is passed over, other candidates include Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), chairman of the Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation and Regulatory Affairs, and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security.

Jordan is a tea party favorite and tough interrogator in committee hearings who has bucked party leadership on occasion. Chaffetz is among those leading the charge on Benghazi, and is also known as a tech-savvy member. A dark horse for the slot could be Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), a longtime intimate of Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) who is a recent addition to the committee. Of the possible candidates, only Chaffetz seems to have the background and interest to maintain Issa’s focus on federal IT as a key oversight issue.

Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.) will be handing off the gavel at the Small Business Committee, which is critically important to small firms looking to do business as government contractors. The committee has looked into strategic sourcing, small business set asides, and has direct oversight authority of the Small Business Administration. Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) is the most senior member on the committee, and is the most likely candidate to take over. Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.), head of the Subcommittee on Contracting and Workforce, is a possible challenger, along with Rep. Scott Tipton (R-Colo.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade.

Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), a cybersecurity hawk who chairs the Appropriations subcommittee that funds the Justice and Commerce departments along with NASA and the National Science Foundation, is stepping down after 17 terms in the House. Wolf is the architect of legislative restrictions on the acquisition of China-made IT by agencies under his appropriations authority. The restrictions are up for reauthorization in the appropriations package now wending its way through Congress, and are controversial among industry groups. It remains to be seen who – if anyone – picks up the torch for  the rules after Wolf leaves.

The Senate could flip to Republicans in the fall elections, which would mean a shift to GOP chairman across the board.  Federal IT watchers might feel this most notably on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, where spending hawk Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) is in line to take over. However, Coburn recently revealed he was undergoing chemotherapy for prostate cancer, and hasn’t ruled out the possibility of cutting his term short to attend to his treatment.

No matter what happens, the chairmanship of the powerful Commerce Committee will change hands in 2015. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) is retiring, and oversight of key technology issues such as telecommunications networks, the Federal Communications Commission, data privacy, much of the civilian cybersecurity portfolio, technology research and development come under the panel’s purview.

If Democrats hold the Senate, Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is next in line in terms of seniority, followed by  Bill Nelson (D-Fla.).

Decisions on committee gavels are almost a year away, so the situation could change considerably. The Senate was already upended a bit by the recent nomination of Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.)  to serve as ambassador to China, and movement to fill a cascade of open committee slots could change the succession picture in the upper chamber no matter which party is in control.



About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy, health IT and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mr. Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial roles at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian started his career as an arts reporter and critic, and has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, Architect magazine, and other publications. He was an editorial assistant and staff writer at the now-defunct New York Press and arts editor at the online network in the 1990s, and was a weekly contributor of music and film reviews to the Washington Times from 2007 to 2014.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.

The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.


Reader comments

Tue, Jan 14, 2014

I think is that what you're saying is that the IT savvy Repubs are also the firebrand ideologues. So they can't get any real support for their IT legislation (regardless of its value) because they make so many enemies via all the witch-hunting. Sound about right?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group