VanRoekel bullish on OMB digital service's potential

Federal CIO Steven VanRoekel at the Feb. 6, 2014, Igniting Innovation event

Federal CIO Steve VanRoekel, shown here at a Febuary ACT-IAC event, said OMB's planned digital services team is being spun up in an agile, test-and-adjust manner.

As attention turned to the Office of Management and Budget with President Barack Obama announcing the nomination of Shaun Donovan as director of OMB, the office of the federal CIO at OMB was making a splash for a different reason.

Pending congressional approval, OMB is planning to create a 25-person team to serve as a policy counterpart to the General Services Administration's newly formed 18F tech development incubator. In a May 23 interview with FCW, U.S. CIO Steve VanRoekel discussed the progress so far and the impact he hopes to see.

The planning and piloting process for this Digital Service has been going on for much of the spring, but the scale-out effort remains on hold pending approval by congressional appropriators.

OMB's digital services team will be working with the 18F team VanRoekel said, and directly with agencies on some of their most high-priority initiatives.

"They'll be looking for opportunities to build shared technology and find platforms, standards and best practices," he explained. "By working with agencies directly, they'll identify gaps in delivery capacity, identify people's needs, technology needs and develop a plan to address those gaps."

Another component will be developing a mechanism to hold agencies accountable for addressing those gaps.

The solution would then come down to three options from which an agency could choose, according to VanRoekel.

"They could find a person internal in the organization. There are plenty of skilled and able people in government. They could work with a vendor to get a new person in the vendor ranks or sub contract with a new company, someone who can address those gaps. Or they can go to 18F, and seize upon the coders, designers, tech people at 18F who can come in and help."

VanRoekel and his team have been taking an agile approach to forming the digital services team itself, he said.

Piloting the program has involved engaging folks from private-sector tech companies to come in and help them do assessments inside government, and test the processes. That pilot process proved that agencies were getting value from the program, VanRoekel said.

Because of the nature of OMB, however, the services this team provides will not include doing actual delivery.

"It's not the core competency of the organization and we don't want to break that culture," VanRoekel said. "They'll be using the authority of OMB, to assess what's going right and what's not going right."

VanRoekel is "crossing his fingers" that Congress will approve the 25 new hires, a request that he said is modest in the context of the tens of thousands of people working in technology across government. And he thinks 25 will be enough to get the job done.

"We proved in the test pilots, and in other OMB efforts like PortfolioStat -- very few people going in and changing the context can actually have really big impact," VanRoekel said. "So I do think we can actually have some real impact."

About the Author

Colby Hochmuth is a former staff writer for FCW.

Cyber. Covered.

Government Cyber Insider tracks the technologies, policies, threats and emerging solutions that shape the cybersecurity landscape.


Reader comments

Wed, May 28, 2014 Washington DC

Could this federal CIO be any more naive? How many years do people have to be in Washington to understand how little agencies focus on OMB? Or how actually large the government is? 25 new people who do nothing at OMB? 50 spinning their wheels so ng nothing at 18F and BILLIONS of IT spend across 3M civilian staff? OMB is not enforcing their requirements from 2012's fashion du jour of a digital strategy. How "open by default" are we? And how do some folks who made money by creating companies (more frequently unrealized ideas) to sell in Silicon Valley going to solve the slog of it backwardness that is the federal gov. We will get no where until they make long term investments in systems. Scraping a website and making an api does not constitute a solution. SVR and his friend Todd Park would do better advocating for real reforms in hiring and buying. Otherwise we are running in place.

Tue, May 27, 2014 DC Fed Washington D.C.

As the media folks would say; "Rack this one". Let's look at this one next Memorial day and ask three simple questions: a) Did the organization get stood up as planned? , b) Did any agency IT shop willingly use the service?, and c) was anything useful delivered as a result of this initiative? I expect the answers will be a) partially set up (work in progress), b) No agency willingly participated (some were coerced) and c) Nothing was delivered that equaled the overall cost to set it up and sustain it for the first year and nothing is likely for the next 2 years after.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group