IG: DOD lacks quality management approach
- By Sean Lyngaas
- Nov 12, 2014
The Defense Department's acquisition office lacks a comprehensive policy for quality management that is "commensurate with the scale, cost and complexity" of major acquisition programs, says a DOD Inspector General report.
The IG concluded that the office of the undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics (AT&L), which is run by Undersecretary Frank Kendall and is in the midst of yet another round of reforming the acquisition system, lacks "effective feedback mechanisms" to evaluate its quality management policies.
Citing the International Organization for Standardization, the IG defined quality management as "a set of coordinated activities" to control how an organization manages the quality of its output. Deficient quality management policies often correlate strongly with cost overruns and program delays.
The IG report measured DOD quality management policies against best practices from private industry. It evaluated how several DOD components, including three of the military services, handle quality management.
Throughout DOD, a “lack of leadership emphasis and attention to overall quality management in acquisition programs often results in quality issues not being handled until late in the acquisition process when the cost to correct such problems is greatly increased,” the report said.
Responding to a draft of the report, AT&L said the Pentagon already has an overarching quality management mechanism in the form of the deputy assistant secretary of Defense for systems engineering. In the report's final version, the IG disagreed with the assertion that the position represents a centralized mechanism for quality management and asked AT&L to respond to that and other disputed recommendations by Dec. 5.
The report follows several others from the Government Accountability Office and the DOD IG in recent years that have pointed out systemic flaws in AT&L’s quality management efforts.
The IG report recommended AT&L set up a central mechanism to oversee quality management system requirements across the department's acquisition programs. Among the other recommendations were that AT&L provide clear quality management system definitions for all major defense acquisition programs. Those definitions should emphasize quality management throughout the acquisition life cycle, the report said.
Sean Lyngaas is a former FCW staff writer.