Congress

Congress moves cyber-hiring, FISMA measures

Shutterstock image.

Included in a bill the House cleared Dec. 10 are provisions that would speed the Department of Homeland Security’s hiring of cybersecurity professionals and allow DHS to pay them more.

The Senate passed the bill, whose banner purpose is simplifying the pay system for border agents, on Sept. 18; the House cleared it by voice-vote on Dec. 10. The legislation now needs President Barack Obama’s signature to become law.

The measure would bring DHS’s ability to hire cyber talent on par with that of the Defense Department and the National Security Agency, according to a statement from Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Tom Carper (D-Del.), a key proponent of the bill. DHS has struggled to compete with both the private sector and, according to Carper, other federal agencies in recruiting and retaining cybersecurity professionals.

Two other cyber-related bills have also moved this week. On Dec. 10, the Senate passed a bill by voice vote that would codify an existing cybersecurity center at DHS. The National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center is DHS’ 24/7 hub for monitoring cyber threats and sharing information with the private sector. That measure now goes to the House, which passed its own bill to codify NCCIC in July.

Meanwhile, the Senate on Dec. 8 passed an update to the Federal Information Security Management Act, also by voice vote. The FISMA Modernization Act would place the authority to set federal information security policies for civilian systems at the Office of Management and Budget, and put DHS in charge of administering security rules. It would require agencies to notify Congress within seven days of a suspected major security breach.

OMB in October gave DHS enhanced authority to scan federal networks, through guidance issued by OMB Director Shaun Donovan.

Carper, who sponsored the FISMA reform bill, said in a statement that the measure would “modernize our outdated federal network security laws, provide the tools and authorities needed to improve security at our federal agencies, and increase transparency and accountability for data breaches at federal agencies.”

Carper’s House counterpart, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has his own bill that focuses policy and implementation at OMB. That bill passed the House in April 2013. A spokesperson released a statement saying that Issa doesn’t back the Carper bill, and wants to see the Senate take up his version.

Lawmakers looking to give the executive branch more tools to combat cyber threats will be encouraged by the progress of the trio of bills. Yet perhaps the bigger prize, a cyber information-sharing bill that some senior lawmakers are eager to pass, still lies idle, with virtually no time left on the legislative calendar for the 113th Congress.

About the Authors

Sean Lyngaas is a former FCW staff writer.

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial roles at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, New York Press, Architect Magazine and other publications.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.


Featured

  • IT Modernization
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    OMB provides key guidance for TMF proposals amid surge in submissions

    Deputy Federal CIO Maria Roat details what makes for a winning Technology Modernization Fund proposal as agencies continue to submit major IT projects for potential funding.

  • gears and money (zaozaa19/Shutterstock.com)

    Worries from a Democrat about the Biden administration and federal procurement

    Steve Kelman is concerned that the push for more spending with small disadvantaged businesses will detract from the goal of getting the best deal for agencies and taxpayers.

Stay Connected