Cybersecurity

Top cyber brass warn Congress on sequestration

world map

A return to sequestration-level spending would be a major setback to U.S. cyber forces that are steadily maturing, top military cyber commanders warned Congress on March 4.

The defense cuts would significantly affect U.S. Cyber Command's ability to defend Defense Department information networks, National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael Rogers, who heads the command, told the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities.

The automated spending cuts mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011 are set to return in fiscal 2016, and require new legislation to be rolled back. At a separate hearing March 4, a top Democrat on the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee said there were "insurmountable obstacles" in moving that legislation forward.  

Service cyber commanders testifying with Rogers echoed the NSA chief’s warning. Sequester-level spending would throw a "monkey wrench" in the Navy's network modernization plans, said Vice Adm. Jan Tighe, head of Navy Fleet Cyber Command. The Navy's planned $1 billion in cyber spending from fiscals 2014 to 2020 is "built on the premise that our future budgets will not be drastically reduced by sequestration," she said.

Lt. Gen. Edward Cardon, head of Army Cyber Command, said that sequestration would disrupt the Army's ongoing process of consolidating its information networks and could leave weapons systems vulnerable by depriving them of software upgrades. Some in the cyber workforce the Army has built up in recent months might have to be laid off, he added.

Sequestration threatens other non-IT aspects of cybersecurity, Rogers said, in that funding might fall short on a project to build out the infrastructure of Cyber Command.

The NSA chief also worried that sequestration could make private-sector work, which often offers big pay raises to those leaving government, look all the more alluring to the DOD cyber workforce.

About the Author

Sean Lyngaas is a former FCW staff writer.

Featured

  • Elections
    voting security

    'Unprecedented' challenges to safe, secure 2020 vote

    Our election infrastructure is bending under the stress of multiple crises. Administrators say they are doing all they can to ensure it doesn't break.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Can government get to zero trust?

    Today's hybrid infrastructures and highly mobile workforces need the protection zero trust security can provide. Too bad there are obstacles at almost every turn.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.