FCC posts open Internet rules, prepares for budget backlash

The Federal Communications Commission posted its 400-page report and new order on Internet neutrality, detailing the rules the agency adopted in a 3-2 vote in late February.

The rules are fairly succinct, but their historical framework and legal basis take some time to explain. Essentially, they boil down to three basic no-nos for Internet service providers: no blocking of access to lawful content or applications; no throttling of connection speeds on the basis of devices or content; and no paid prioritization, or "fast lanes," for particular content or services.

The order reclassifies broadband Internet access from an information service to a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act, a reversal of a 13-year-old FCC decision. That is because the way consumers view ISPs has changed, according to a senior FCC official.

Primarily, consumers look to ISPs as a transmission platform for access to online content, services and applications. In the early days of the consumer Internet, people bought into a bundle of access and applications like the type offered by AOL, the official said during a conference call with reporters.

FCC's latest action is expected to draw court challenges. Agency officials speaking on background stressed that the FCC rules were written to survive court challenges, but in his dissent, Republican FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai predicted that the action would be overturned in court.

But there is also the question of FCC's funding in Congress. The agency is seeking an $84 million funding increase, with 25 percent of that set to go to IT upgrades, including a move to the cloud, and a rewrite of legacy applications.

Next week, House and Senate committees are hosting all five FCC commissioners at separate oversight hearings. Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee's Communications and Technology Subcommittee, previewed what might be in store for the agency during the upcoming round of appropriations.

"The FCC is a child of Congress, and it is high time that we return to the good government practice of having the authorizing committee take a hard look at the agency before Congress hands over another appropriation," Walden said in a March 9 speech at the American Enterprise Institute.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial roles at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, New York Press, Architect Magazine and other publications.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.


  • Cybersecurity
    malware detection (Alexander Yakimov/

    Microsoft targets copycat influence websites

    Microsoft went to court to take down websites it believes to be part of a foreign intelligence operation targeting conservative think tanks and the U.S. Senate.

  • Cybersecurity
    secure network

    FAA explores shifting its network to FISMA high

    The Federal Aviation Administration is exploring an upgrade to the information security categorization of IT systems as part of air traffic control modernization.

  • Cybersecurity
    Shutterstock photo id 669226093 By Gorodenkoff

    The disinformation game

    The federal government is poised to bring new tools and strategies to bear in the fight against foreign-backed online disinformation campaigns, but how and when they choose to act could have ramifications on the U.S. political ecosystem.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.