Data Snapshot

'At will' employment for SES: What could possibly go wrong?

Congress has already made it easier to fire Senior Executive Service officials in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and legislation has been floated that would make SES leaders at-will employees governmentwide. A new survey from the Senior Executives Association finds, unsurprisingly, that most SES'ers are not fans of the idea.

The SEA polled 476 current and retired senior executive service member on the potential impact of "At Will Employment" legislation. Respondents warned of several adverse consequences:

In your opinion, which of the following are likely to occur from AWE implementation?

- Active SES   - Retired SES

  1. Career executives will be more likely to carry out orders which they believe may present legal or ethical concerns.
  2. Career executives will be less likely to disagree with their immediate supervisors or political leadership.
  3. SES supervisors or political leadership will be more likely to fire career executives they disagree with, don't trust, or simply don't like.
  4. Career executives will be less likely to innovate since such actions outside existing performance plans are (1) riskier and therefore more likely to fail, (2) likely to make it harder for executives to meet the performance goals in their plans.
  5. Career executives will be more likely to place their attention and efforts on directives which do not relate to their immediate responsibilities or performance standards but which they believe will please their immediate supervisor or political leadership.


The respondents were also skeptical of supposed benefits of AWE legislation.  At least 79 percent of both active and retired personnel said it would not improve any of the following workforce issues:

  • agencies’ retention of senior executives and professional employees,
  • recruitment of talented employees already within government to the SES and
  • recruitment of individuals working outside the federal government.

Respondents worried that AWE legislation had the potential to politicize the SES and place employees in situations where an abuse of authority might thrive in lieu of ethical or legal protections. Seventy-nine percent of active and 73 percent of retired respondents said AWE would increase the likelihood that senior executives would retire as soon as they are eligible to do so.


Survey Source: "Promoting Accountability or Threatening Federal Government Effectiveness and Senior Management Capability?"

About the Author

Jonathan Lutton is an FCW editorial fellow. Connect with him at jlutton@fcw.com

Featured

  • Contracting
    8 prototypes of the border walls as tweeted by CBP San Diego

    DHS contractors face protests – on the streets

    Tech companies are facing protests internally from workers and externally from activists about doing for government amid controversial policies like "zero tolerance" for illegal immigration.

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    At OPM, Weichert pushes direct hire, pay agent changes

    Margaret Weichert, now acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, is clearing agencies to make direct hires in IT, cyber and other tech fields and is changing pay for specialized occupations.

  • Cloud
    Shutterstock ID ID: 222190471 By wk1003mike

    IBM protests JEDI cloud deal

    As the deadline to submit bids on the Pentagon's $10 billion, 10-year warfighter cloud deal draws near, IBM announced a legal protest.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.