Data Snapshot

'At will' employment for SES: What could possibly go wrong?

Congress has already made it easier to fire Senior Executive Service officials in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and legislation has been floated that would make SES leaders at-will employees governmentwide. A new survey from the Senior Executives Association finds, unsurprisingly, that most SES'ers are not fans of the idea.

The SEA polled 476 current and retired senior executive service member on the potential impact of "At Will Employment" legislation. Respondents warned of several adverse consequences:

In your opinion, which of the following are likely to occur from AWE implementation?

- Active SES   - Retired SES

  1. Career executives will be more likely to carry out orders which they believe may present legal or ethical concerns.
  2. Career executives will be less likely to disagree with their immediate supervisors or political leadership.
  3. SES supervisors or political leadership will be more likely to fire career executives they disagree with, don't trust, or simply don't like.
  4. Career executives will be less likely to innovate since such actions outside existing performance plans are (1) riskier and therefore more likely to fail, (2) likely to make it harder for executives to meet the performance goals in their plans.
  5. Career executives will be more likely to place their attention and efforts on directives which do not relate to their immediate responsibilities or performance standards but which they believe will please their immediate supervisor or political leadership.


The respondents were also skeptical of supposed benefits of AWE legislation.  At least 79 percent of both active and retired personnel said it would not improve any of the following workforce issues:

  • agencies’ retention of senior executives and professional employees,
  • recruitment of talented employees already within government to the SES and
  • recruitment of individuals working outside the federal government.

Respondents worried that AWE legislation had the potential to politicize the SES and place employees in situations where an abuse of authority might thrive in lieu of ethical or legal protections. Seventy-nine percent of active and 73 percent of retired respondents said AWE would increase the likelihood that senior executives would retire as soon as they are eligible to do so.


Survey Source: "Promoting Accountability or Threatening Federal Government Effectiveness and Senior Management Capability?"

About the Author

Jonathan Lutton is an FCW editorial fellow. Connect with him at jlutton@fcw.com

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.