Critical Read

Parsing the cyber bills in the 114th Congress

US Capitol

What: A comparison of the various cybersecurity bills put forward in the current Congress by the Congressional Research Service.

Why: As high-profile breaches in the public and private sectors have mounted, Congress has taken up a number of bills that try to accomplish the same thing in different ways: to make the sharing of cyber-threat information between the private sector and the government easier.

CRS’s analysis covers two bills that have passed the House – the Protecting Cyber Networks Act (PCNA) and the National Cybersecurity Protection Advancement Act (NCPAA) – along with the Senate’s Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA). The two House bills have been folded into one, while the fate of the Senate bill hangs in the balance. North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, tried to attach CISA as an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill, but Senate Democrats blocked the measure.

CISA and PCNA are generally more similar to each other than either is to NCPAA, according to the report. NCPAA focuses on the role of the Department of Homeland Security in information sharing, while PCNA focuses more on the intelligence community and the nascent cyber intelligence agency being stood up at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The CRS analysis acknowledges that the bills address, in significant ways, privacy concerns to information sharing, which have been a sticking point for Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and civil liberties groups.

Verbatim: “Resistance to sharing of information among private-sector entities might not be substantially reduced by the actions contemplated in the legislation; and information sharing is only one of many facets of cybersecurity that organizations need to address to secure their systems and information.”

Full report: Read the full report here.

About the Author

Sean Lyngaas is an FCW staff writer covering defense, cybersecurity and intelligence issues. Prior to joining FCW, he was a reporter and editor at Smart Grid Today, where he covered everything from cyber vulnerabilities in the U.S. electric grid to the national energy policies of Britain and Mexico. His reporting on a range of global issues has appeared in publications such as The Atlantic, The Economist, The Washington Diplomat and The Washington Post.

Lyngaas is an active member of the National Press Club, where he served as chairman of the Young Members Committee. He earned his M.A. in international affairs from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, and his B.A. in public policy from Duke University.

Click here for previous articles by Lyngaas, or connect with him on Twitter: @snlyngaas.


Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.