Health IT

DOD awards massive health records contract

Shutterstock image: health factors.

The team of Leidos, Accenture and Cerner is getting the Defense Department's massive electronic health records contract – and the military appears to be getting a bargain.

The Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization, or DHMSM, contract was initially estimated to have an $11 billion lifecycle cost through 2030, but the actual award announced July 29 is for a fraction of that amount: $4,336,822,777 over 10 years if the options are exercised.

"We feel confident that we made a good source selection," said Chris Miller, Defense Healthcare Management Systems program executive officer, on a call with reporters. "Competition has worked, costs have come in below our estimates. We're very happy with the results we've got."

Big competition

Epic Systems, the electronic health records (EHR) industry leader, had partnered with IBM to bid on the contract, and was widely considered to be the favorite for the win.

EHR vendor Allscripts had teamed up with Computer Sciences Corp. and Hewlett-Packard for its bid, and PricewaterhouseCoopers briefly led another team bid. According to the DOD award announcement, there were six bids in all.

But it was Epic's rival Cerner -- which had long touted its edge in providing EHR interoperability -- that pulled off a coup. The fact that the behemoth Epic wouldn't win was hinted at earlier in the day (and reported early by NextGov), before the official 5 p.m. announcement.

"Market share really wasn't a consideration," said Frank Kendall, undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics. "We wanted someone who had proven they could do what we needed to get done."

Kendall added that the Defense Department is prepared to weather a bid protest, though he isn't certain one will come.

"There is a clear best value, and I think that will be clear to the people who weren't selected," he said.

A massive undertaking

In tackling the contract, the Cerner team will have its work cut out for it.

DHMSM aims for a single, commercial product that includes full interoperability with the Veterans Affairs' VistA health records system as well as private-sector systems, while serving some 9.6 million service members, retirees and dependents.

The system will need to be deployable from the front lines of combat all the way home, accessed by more than 150,000 professional providers at 55 hospitals and more than 600 clinics, said Dr. Jonathan Woodson, assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs.

Several years of upgrades are included in contract.

The system will need to run along some 50 legacy systems, gradually replacing some and working with others, Miller noted, as the consolidation of military health services continues.

What's next

Change management will be critical, Miller noted, saying more than 25 percent of the contract will go to support and training to ensure clinicians know how to use it.

"Today is just the beginning," he noted. "The hard part is about to start."

DHMSM is scheduled to be tested at eight sites in the Pacific Northwest starting at the end of 2016, with a full rollout by 2022.

That schedule could still change, however. "We want this to be an event-driven program, not a schedule-driven program," Kendall said. "We're not going to take risks to stick to a schedule."

Conversely, he added, "we'd like to go more quickly" if possible.

Kendall also spoke to what he called a "big misconception" about interoperability between the military and the VA.

"We are interoperable with the VA today," he said.

Kendall said the new system would merely provide an opportunity to "enhance" the existing interoperability.

Miller, meanwhile, rebuffed concerns about "vendor lock," noting that the Defense Department will own all of the data rights under the contract.

"We own 100 percent of our data," he noted. "People cannot charge us to share our data."

He added that it remains to be hashed out whether the data centers running the new military health records system will be Defense Department-owned or owned by the vendor.

About the Author

Zach Noble is a staff writer covering digital citizen services, workforce issues and a range of civilian federal agencies.

Before joining FCW in 2015, Noble served as assistant editor at the viral news site TheBlaze, where he wrote a mix of business, political and breaking news stories and managed weekend news coverage. He has also written for online and print publications including The Washington Free Beacon, The Santa Barbara News-Press, The Federalist and Washington Technology.

Noble is a graduate of Saint Vincent College, where he studied English, economics and mathematics.

Click here for previous articles by Noble, or connect with him on Twitter: @thezachnoble.


Nominate Today!

Nominations for the 2018 Federal 100 Awards are now being accepted, and are due by Dec. 23. 

Featured

Reader comments

Mon, Aug 3, 2015

Understand that the data is 100% owned by the DOD; what about the software itself? Will it be available via Public Domain such as VistA?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group