Workforce

After the breach: 21.5 million exposed individuals still waiting

Shutterstock image (by Pavel Ignatov): Alert icon.

The 21.5 million feds, contractors and others exposed in the Office of Personnel Management security clearance data breach have yet to receive official notification of their exposure, credit monitoring and other identity protection services, and until a contractor gets the award for those services, they’ll continue to wait.

That’s despite initial estimates that a contract would be out by Aug. 21.

It’s been nearly three months since news of the OPM breaches first hit, and as FCW reported, the pair of breaches that OPM learned of in April and had described as two separate intrusions was actually one sustained assault.

But while the 4 million feds exposed in the “first” breach have received notifications and credit monitoring, the agencies charged with awarding the contract for the much bigger notification job -- the General Services Administration and the Naval Sea Systems Command -- are missing self-imposed deadlines.

Quotations from vendors were due Aug. 14.

“GSA and NAVSEA, respectively, anticipate award of the BPA and first order in late August 2015,” GSA spokeswoman Stephanie Kenitzer said in an Aug. 24 email.

A week later, on the last day of August, Kenitzer told FCW that the Aug. 21 date, which appears in NAVSEA’s request documentation but not GSA’s, was never a firm deadline.

“That was not a date that was ever out on any of our postings,” she said, despite NAVSEA’s documents being hosted on GSA Interact. “We never had any intention of being able to make the award by that date.”

In multiple conversations, Kenitzer stressed the scope and importance of the contract.

“We want to make sure we get it right,” she said. “All the acquisition pieces have to line up properly for this to happen.”

On Aug. 31, Kenitzer could not say when the contract might be awarded.

In June, libertarian publication Reason noted that, given OPM learned of the data breach in April, the federal government was failing to meet the standards to which it holds the private sector when it comes to data breach notifications.

Two months later, the majority of affected individuals are still in the dark.

“This delay in the second contract could mean that OPM, through their various intergovernmental partnerships, is fine-tuning a necessary and expansive contract,” said National Federation of Federal Employees spokesman Drew Halunen. “It could also mean that OPM is simply dragging its feet and failing to grasp the immensity of this unprecedented data breach.”

Halunen also noted the “repeated failures” of the contract work on the first round of breach notifications, saying, “[W]e hope OPM has learned from their mistakes and will have an adequately-prepared outside vendor.”

About the Author

Zach Noble is a former FCW staff writer.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    CISA chief Chris Krebs disusses the future of the agency at Auburn University Aug. 22 2019

    Shared services and the future of CISA

    Chris Krebs, the head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency at DHS, said that many federal agencies will be outsourcing cyber to a shared service provider in the future.

  • Telecom
    GSA Headquarters (Photo by Rena Schild/Shutterstock)

    GSA softens line on looming EIS due date

    Think of the September deadline for agencies to award contracts under the General Services Administration's $50-billion telecommunications contract as a "yellow light," said GSA's telecom services director.

  • Defense
    Shutterstock photo id 669226093 By Gorodenkoff

    IC looks to stand up a new enterprise IT program office

    The intelligence community wants to stand up a new program executive office to help develop new IT capabilities.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.