Comment

A neglected casualty of a government shutdown

Trey Hodgkins

Trey Hodgkins argues that any government shutdown would exact a high toll on contractors and their employees -- and on the work they do for federal agencies.

It's a common misconception (and even a punch line) that a government shutdown saves money. That couldn't be further from the truth. In fact, the 16-day government shutdown in 2013 blew a $24 billion crater in the economy that put a freeze on hiring, left a hole in workers' pockets and affected the government's ability to carry out its functions.

The Oct. 1 deadline to pass a budget that funds the government is one week away. Sadly, although there has been much discussion of a short-term continuing resolution (CR) to keep the government open and operating beyond Sept. 30, the drumbeat of news reports cast doubt on that outcome.

Although the focus will naturally be drawn to the impact on federal agencies and their workers, it's important that we bear in mind the high cost a shutdown will have on government contractors, their employees and the services they provide. A shutdown can have a broad range of impacts on contractors depending on what is deemed essential, what has been funded already and will continue, or what work has been funded but is ordered to stop.

During the 2013 shutdown, varied situations emerged. One disabled veteran-owned small business couldn't hire the new employees it needed, causing their remaining employees to double their hours to meet the performance requirements of their government contracts.

More common was the story of a contractor whose operations came to a complete halt because it could no longer bill for its work, and its employees were temporarily furloughed without pay. Another contractor who had funding and planned to continue working was given a stop-work order and had to shutter its operations.

In the national capital region, more than 10,000 stop-work orders for contracts and numerous temporary layoffs occurred in the weeks that followed.

Unlike agencies and their employees, who return to work after a shutdown ends and find operations funded and lost wages restored, contractors are not made whole. For contracted work that must go on during a shutdown, the resulting costs are paid for by internal cuts, hiring freezes, increased costs for taxpayers or a combination of these. Until Congress resolves funding, some contractors must keep their employees ready and available to begin working again and will have to dig into already thin operating margins to keep payroll going while there is no work to be done.

Other contractor employees will face layoffs or furloughs until their employers can start billing again for work performed, but they will likely have to consider those wages lost.

Then there is the long-term damage to the talent pool. Finding, attracting, hiring and retaining skilled workers are increasingly difficult for contractors working in the public sector because wages paid by the government are usually below those that can be found in the private sector. Holding onto employees in the midst of a shutdown makes that effort all the more difficult.

Companies, too, will reassess the value of doing business with a customer that cannot efficiently and regularly fund its operations. The private sector doesn't hold such risks, so government shutdowns tarnish any attraction companies might have to the federal market. When contractors take their extensive experience and knowledge elsewhere, the government and taxpayers suffer.

Unfortunately, even averting a shutdown will have consequences because a CR will likely fund the government for only a portion of fiscal 2016. Under a CR, agencies can fund only ongoing operations, not new contracts, and that leaves the government stuck with older networks and systems rather than being able to reap the benefits of newer, more advanced information technologies.

Put another way, the inability to complete the appropriations process forces the government to meet mission and constituent needs with less secure, efficient, interconnected, interoperable or capable technologies.

Fiscal certainty is essential to moving the government into the 21st century and the digital era. It is also critical for the government contractor community to maintain business viability, sustain cash flow and retain a skilled workforce. Congress and the president have a shared responsibility to return to the hard work of enacting appropriations on time to fund the year ahead. Only then will government agencies be able to successfully plan and effectively invest in the innovative technology sorely needed to help increase the security, efficiency and ability to accomplish their work successfully on behalf of the American people.

About the Author

Trey Hodgkins is the Senior Vice President, Public Sector at the Information Technology Alliance for Public Sector or ITAPS, a division of ITI, where he manages a team of professionals responsible for all advocacy, public policy and business development activities for companies facing the Public Sector market. The Public Sector team at ITAPS is focused on National Security, Homeland Security & Federal Law Enforcement, Federal Civil and State & Local and Education Technology market verticals in the public sector. Additionally, the team monitors all legislative and regulatory proposals impacting procurement policy at the Federal and State & Local levels.

Trey has over 30 years in the Federal, State and Local government arenas, with almost half of that time focused on information technology in the public sector. He has served as a staff aide in the Louisiana State Legislature, as a Federal Liaison at the National Rifle Association; Assistant Director for Legislative Affairs at the American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Manager of Governmental Affairs at the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, Director of Government Relations at the Association of Old Crows and as a Senior Vice President at TechAmerica.

Trey holds two Bachelor’s degrees - in Political Science and History – from Louisiana State University and a Masters degree in Legislative Affairs from The George Washington University. He also holds a Certification as an Association Executive from the American Society of Association Executives.

Trey has been awarded the prestigious Fed 100 Award for his work on IT procurement reform and is a member of the Procurement Round Table.

Featured

  • Telecommunications
    Stock photo ID: 658810513 By asharkyu

    GSA extends EIS deadline to 2023

    Agencies are getting up to three more years on existing telecom contracts before having to shift to the $50 billion Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions vehicle.

  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image ID: 569172169 By Zenzen

    OMB looks to retrain feds to fill cyber needs

    The federal government is taking steps to fill high-demand, skills-gap positions in tech by retraining employees already working within agencies without a cyber or IT background.

  • Acquisition
    GSA Headquarters (Photo by Rena Schild/Shutterstock)

    GSA to consolidate multiple award schedules

    The General Services Administration plans to consolidate dozens of its buying schedules across product areas including IT and services to reduce duplication.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.