Congress

Senate tees up vote on cyber bill

Shutterstock image:  Capitol building in Washington, D.C.

The Senate on Oct. 22 moved a controversial information-sharing cybersecurity bill forward on a procedural vote, setting the stage for a final vote on the measure as early as next week.

The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act is the latest in a long line of legislative efforts to encourage private firms to share more cyber threat data amongst themselves and with the government. CISA encourages this by giving firms certain protections from antitrust and consumer privacy liabilities when they report threat information.

The Senate voted 83-14 to move the bill ahead. A 60-vote majority was required to advance CISA. A set of seven amendments is scheduled for a vote on Oct. 27. That will be followed by a cloture vote and a final vote on the underlying bill.

Privacy groups have decried the bill as an expansion of government surveillance. Apple and a trade group representing Amazon, Google and Facebook have come out against the legislation.

Privacy hawk Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) was among the 14 lawmakers who voted against cloture. Of the presidential candidates, Sens. Ron Paul (R-Ky.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) also voted against cloture, while Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) did not vote.

The bill is voluntary, "so it's hard for me to understand why we have companies like Apple and Google and Microsoft and others saying they can't support the bill at this time," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a co-sponsor of the bill, said in an Oct. 21 statement from the Senate floor. "You have no reason, because you don't have to do anything, but there are companies by the hundreds if not thousands that want to participate in this."

About the Author

Sean Lyngaas is a former FCW staff writer.

Featured

  • Elections
    voting security

    'Unprecedented' challenges to safe, secure 2020 vote

    Our election infrastructure is bending under the stress of multiple crises. Administrators say they are doing all they can to ensure it doesn't break.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Can government get to zero trust?

    Today's hybrid infrastructures and highly mobile workforces need the protection zero trust security can provide. Too bad there are obstacles at almost every turn.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.