Cybersecurity

Industry says it's fed up with feds' no hack-back rules

sphere of binary data

Some companies are frustrated that the government is not hitting back at foreign cyber adversaries and prohibiting the companies themselves from retaliating, according to speakers at a Nov. 5 Chertoff Group event.

To them, cyberspace looks like Dodge City without a U.S. marshal in sight.Citing the loss of hundreds of billions of dollars of intellectual property to Chinese hackers, Raytheon Director of Programs Security Randall Fort asked, "Why shouldn't [American firms] be able to do something about that?"

"I think once you go outside your networks, you're setting a dangerous precedent," said George Duchak, director of the Defense Department's Defense Innovation Unit Experimental. "It becomes like the Wild West where everybody's shooting, and there would be a lot of collateral damage."

But the threat of private cyber war looms as firms seethe under government inaction and lawmakers are being presented with punitive hacking options.

Renee Tarun, senior cyber strategist on the National Security Agency's Cyber Task Force, warned companies that it can be difficult to determine the source of a hack.

Fort countered by saying, "In my company, I actually have the screenshots of the Chinese [who] are stealing my information. So the attribution issue isn't necessarily a problem for everybody."

Marty Roesch, vice president and chief architect in Cisco's Security Business Group, cited some of the downsides to companies taking matters into their own hands.

"Where do you stop?" he asked, wondering whether the small number of firms capable of carrying out retributive hacks would go so far as to hire hitmen when they realized foreign hackers could just hop from Internet cafe to Internet cafe.

"It feels really good to do something, but unless we have some kind of framework around what that something can be...what's to really stop it from turning into the Wild West or having levels of escalation that nobody's prepared for?" Roesch asked. "You hack back, take them off the Internet, they go down the road and decide they're going to take out the entire power grid that's powering the data center that is doing the hack back."

Nevertheless, the panelists agreed that the modest cyber agreement between China and the U.S. is a good step toward avoiding catastrophic escalation.

About the Author

Zach Noble is a staff writer covering digital citizen services, workforce issues and a range of civilian federal agencies.

Before joining FCW in 2015, Noble served as assistant editor at the viral news site TheBlaze, where he wrote a mix of business, political and breaking news stories and managed weekend news coverage. He has also written for online and print publications including The Washington Free Beacon, The Santa Barbara News-Press, The Federalist and Washington Technology.

Noble is a graduate of Saint Vincent College, where he studied English, economics and mathematics.

Click here for previous articles by Noble, or connect with him on Twitter: @thezachnoble.


Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.