Shared Services

GAO nixes Peace Corps' email plans

Shutterstock image (by Pavel Ignatov): digital email icon.

The Government Accountability Office has upheld a Google Government reseller's protest and ruled that the Peace Corps can't add email services to an existing delivery order for Microsoft licenses without opening the follow-on contract to competitive bids.

On Nov. 9, GAO agreed with Google cloud services reseller Onix Networking's protest, filed in July, that a Peace Corps email-as-a-service modification to an existing contract with Microsoft services reseller En Pointe Gov was not competitive and amounted to an improper sole-source award.

"The whole area of follow-ons [is] ill-defined" by federal regulations, longtime federal consultant Larry Allen, president of Allen Federal Business Partners, told FCW. With the Onix protest, he added, "GAO said, 'Wait a minute'" about using follow-ons to make significant changes.

Before making the award to En Pointe Gov, the Peace Corps had issued a request for information about EaaS products, leading Onix to respond, according to GAO.

Ultimately, the Peace Corps chose to modify the existing delivery order with En Pointe Gov, reasoning that the delivery order "contemplated the acquisition of cloud-based services," and EaaS was "merely the next logical step in updating the agency's existing computing environment," GAO auditors wrote.

The protest extends what has been a long and problematic effort to modernize the Peace Corps' email systems. In 2014, the agency piloted a project to migrate email, collaboration and document management systems to the cloud through GSA's shared services model. However, the Peace Corps' Office of Inspector General issued a report in March of this year questioning whether the agency followed federal acquisition rules when it signed a Memorandum of Understanding with GSA to use its Google-powered e-mail service, and pilot project was not continued.

That next logical step is what GAO is now beginning to define, Allen said. Agencies have traditionally been left to their own devices when it comes to follow-on contracts, so GAO's ruling marks a sea change, he added.

"It's a wake-up call for agencies" that they have to think through the process and what is intrinsically related to their original contracts, he said. "It's probably not the last word," but it begins the process of defining what agencies can do with follow-ons under the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a senior staff writer at FCW, whose beat focuses on acquisition, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Energy.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, tele.com magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at mrockwell@fcw.com or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.


Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.