Congress

Wassenaar Arrangement could get a redo over cyber

Jan. 12, 2016, Wassenaar hearing

Lawmakers quizzed government and industry about the 2013 Wassenar Arrangement.

Federal officials and industry experts who testified before a joint hearing of two House subcommittees on Jan. 12 agreed with lawmakers that the government should re-evaluate its support for an international arrangement that imposes export controls on intrusion and surveillance technologies among participating countries.

"If I had the information I had today, clearly we would have negotiated differently," Ann Ganzer, director of the Office of Conventional Arms Threat Reduction at the State Department, told members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee's IT Subcommittee and the Homeland Security Committee's Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies Subcommittee.

Forty-one countries participate in the Wassenaar Arrangement, which seeks to promote transparency and greater responsibility in the export of conventional weapons. In 2013, it was amended to cover Internet-based surveillance technologies in an effort to prevent companies from selling their products to countries with a history of human rights abuses. In May 2015, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security published a proposed rule to implement the amendments and received heavy opposition in the form of 264 public comments.

Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas), chairman of the Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies Subcommittee, said the technology provision is unlikely to achieve the "open and interoperable cyberspace that is in the public's interest."

"If we are to expect the cybersecurity provisions of this arrangement to be workable, we need to make sure our stated intentions and actions are not contradictory,” he added. "If we can't do that, I question why we as a country are agreeing to this updated arrangement."

Phyllis Schneck, deputy undersecretary for cybersecurity and communications at the Department of Homeland Security, agreed with Ratcliffe's assessment. She told lawmakers that the proposal conflicts with the U.S. government’s cybersecurity efforts.

"We've had a challenge in finding a way to adopt export controls," Schneck added.

Cheri Flynn McGuire, vice president of global government affairs and cybersecurity policy at Symantec, said the proposed amendments "would severely damage our ability to innovate and develop new cybersecurity products."

Schneck said an agreement that combines the benefits of export control with cybersecurity should be considered.

Proposals for implementing the Wassenaar Arrangement are due in March and will be debated throughout the year.

About the Author

Aisha Chowdhry is a former staff writer for FCW.


Featured

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

  • Comment
    Blue Signage and logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Doing digital differently at VA

    The Department of Veterans Affairs CIO explains why digital transformation is not optional.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.