Oversight

Audit finds improprieties in GSA/Peace Corps cloud email pilot

Shutterstock image (by wk1003mike): cloud system fracture.

The General Services Administration was one of the first federal agencies to adopt a cloud-based service enterprisewise, and it has actively urged other agencies to do the same. In 2014, that proselytizing took the form of providing cloud-based email services to the Peace Corps at no cost.

However, GSA did not receive the Office of Management and Budget approval necessary for all interagency services and provided the Peace Corps pilot project with six months of services -- over two separate three-month stints -- without an active memorandum of understanding between the two agencies, according to a March 22 report from GSA's Office of Inspector General.

Additionally, the report states that the Economy Act of 1932 -- the legislative authority the two agencies cited to permit GSA to provide services to the Peace Corps -- requires payment for those services. The improper arrangement effectively augmented the Peace Corps' budget by $24,777.

In developing the pilot program without OMB's approval, GSA circumvented protocol and provided the Peace Corps with upwards of 500 cloud-based computing licenses that were not intended for interagency use, the OIG concluded.

The report found that GSA offered cloud services for three months before the MOU was finalized in December 2014, then again from February to May 2015 without an active agreement between the two agencies. The lack of formal agreement meant there were no terms and conditions outlining what the shared services would include, and each agency's responsibilities were undefined.

The report is not the first time an oversight entity has raised concerns about the GSA/Peace Corps cloud services partnership. The Peace Corps' OIG issued a report in March 2015 detailing concerns that proper processes were not being followed, and it made six recommendations of its own.

Among other things, GSA's OIG recommended that the agency take steps to ensure future compliance with federal policy and guidelines; seek approval from senior leaders, GSA's Office of General Counsel and OMB before commencing interagency work; and enact an official agreement before any shared services are provided.

GSA officials concurred with all the recommendations.

About the Author

Chase Gunter is a former FCW staff writer.

Featured

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    OPM nominee plans focus on telework, IT, retirement

    Kiran Ahuja, a veteran of the Office of Personnel Management, told lawmakers that she thinks that the lack of consistent leadership in the top position at OPM has taken a toll on the ability of the agency to complete longer term IT modernization projects.

  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

Stay Connected