Mobility

Air Force wants to link iPads with SIPRNET

Air Force CTO Frank Konieczny wants to connect some of the service's 30,000 iPads to the Defense Department's classified network but not before they pass security tests to keep new vulnerabilities from being introduced to Air Force networks.

As of now, the iPads do not even connect to DOD's unclassified network, known as NIPRNet, he said.

"One of the concerns that we have is that we want to make sure that the e-books...on the iPads can actually be accessed from the flight line in a certain way that they can have interconnectivity back and forth with the logistic centers," he said in a May 3 interview.

The iPads is obviously not a new technology, and the Air Force has been using the device since at least 2012. But recent advances in mobile device security and the ability to compartmentalize information have made it possible to further integrate iPads into Air Force networks, Konieczny said. He spoke with FCW after his appearance at a conference in Washington hosted by FedScoop.

An iPad's electronic transmissions could pose a risk to sensitive aircraft equipment, he said. On the other hand, the ability to access unclassified and classified networks from their iPads could give Air Force personnel valuable data at their fingertips.

The Air Force's IT governance body will review a proposed trial deployment of iPads on NIPRNet in the coming weeks, Konieczny said, adding that the pilot project could be underway this summer or fall.

The service is perhaps a year away from connecting some of its iPads to the classified SIPRNet because that access will require more testing, he said. The goal is to reduce a device's functionality to one mode on SIPRNet, such as using a bar code reader for identification, he said. The more functions enabled on a device, the more potential attack vectors for hackers.

Konieczny also has his eye on the Internet of Things, a catchall term for any device with an internet connection. He said he wants the Air Force to catalog as many of the service's internet-connected devices as possible. If a device isn't in the catalog and is broadcasting suspicious information from a military base, for example, officials would know not to trust the device, he said.

Industrial control systems are already on officials' radar as having IoT vulnerabilities, Konieczny said, but there are many other devices, such as temperature sensors, that also deserve scrutiny.

About the Author

Sean Lyngaas is an FCW staff writer covering defense, cybersecurity and intelligence issues. Prior to joining FCW, he was a reporter and editor at Smart Grid Today, where he covered everything from cyber vulnerabilities in the U.S. electric grid to the national energy policies of Britain and Mexico. His reporting on a range of global issues has appeared in publications such as The Atlantic, The Economist, The Washington Diplomat and The Washington Post.

Lyngaas is an active member of the National Press Club, where he served as chairman of the Young Members Committee. He earned his M.A. in international affairs from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, and his B.A. in public policy from Duke University.

Click here for previous articles by Lyngaas, or connect with him on Twitter: @snlyngaas.


Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.