Law Enforcement

Tech groups oppose expanding FBI hacking authority

Leslie Caldwell, assistant Attorney General. Photo credit: Sean Lyngaas, FCW.

Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell has defended proposed rule changes for federal warrants to search computers, but privacy advocates and technology companies are urging Congress to block the changes.

A coalition of technology firms and organizations that includes Google and PayPal has sent a letter to House and Senate leaders expressing opposition to proposed rule changes that it says would dramatically expand law enforcement's hacking authorities.

The new rules, which the Supreme Court approved in April, would allow federal judges to issue search warrants for computers outside their jurisdictions. Congress has until Dec. 1 to reverse the decision before it takes effect, and lawmakers are considering legislation to do so.

The rule changes "would invite law enforcement to seek warrants authorizing them to hack thousands of computers at once -- which it is hard to imagine would not be in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment," the June 21 letter states. Other signatories include the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Tor Project.

The Justice Department has long sought the amendments to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, arguing that the "remote searches" the amendments authorize are often the only way to find criminals who mask their online footprints.

In a June 20 blog post, Leslie Caldwell, assistant attorney general for Justice's Criminal Division, said the changes would not allow the government to use any remote search technique that is not already authorized by law.

She said the rule would apply in two narrow circumstances: When suspects have used anonymizing technology to hide their locations, and when the crime involves suspects hacking computers located in five or more judicial districts.

Anonymizing tools include the Tor network, which is also used by law enforcement agents, journalists and human rights activists.

But Justice's defense of the rule changes has done little, if anything, to allay privacy groups' criticism of the amendments. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and others have conveyed the urgency of opposing the rule changes via a neon-green website,, with a subhead that reads: "Don't let the U.S. government hack our computers."

"The rule changes do not impose any additional protections to address the heightened impact that government hacking will have on internet users' security and privacy," the opposition letter states.

Last month, Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced legislation to block the changes to Rule 41. Reps. Ted Poe (R-Texas) and John Conyers (D-Mich.) have introduced a companion bill in the House.

About the Author

Sean Lyngaas is a former FCW staff writer.


  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

Stay Connected