Congress

White House would veto email blocking bill

Shutterstock image: secured files.

The House of Representatives passed a slate of measures to give agencies unfettered authority to block employee access to personal webmail, online pornography and potentially risky web applications, regardless of union contracts.

The legislative package includes the Federal Information Systems Safeguards Act, the Eliminating Pornography from Agencies Act, the Senior Executive Service Accountability Act and other measures affecting federal IT and federal employment.

According to the bill report, the legislation is designed to "eliminate an ambiguity" in federal information law that lets union contacts govern employee access to personal online services. The bill would let CIOs determine what services, like webmail, would be accessible via agency networks regardless of any contractual provisions.

However, opponents think it has little to do with computer security, and more to do with cutting into the bargaining power of federal employee unions. Democrats oppose the bill, as do federal employee unions. When the bill came up on the House calendar, the White House issued a veto threat.

"Certain sections of this legislation would weaken the rights of Federal employees, and be impractical and administratively burdensome to implement," the White House wrote on July 5 in response to the legislative package. "They would also have harmful unintended consequences, while failing to address the issues they are designed to solve and while raising serious constitutional concerns."  

The White House is also concerned that the bill would "require expedited removal procedures for agency senior executives that would raise significant constitutional concerns under the Appointments Clause and the Due Process Clause."

Lead sponsor Rep. Gary Palmer (R-Ala.) told FCW that "federal employees have the right to work at work. They don't have the right to access their personal email, to access websites unrelated to their work, and they certainly shouldn't have a right to negotiate the American government securing the safety of the American people's information and data."

Cosponsor Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.) said, "President Obama has the right to veto this bill, but when he does, the stroke of his pen will say he believes federal employees are entitled to view pornography on government computers." He added that blocking the bill will "put the computer systems of the federal government at risk from hackers for foreign governments and terrorist networks."

The White House disagreed, saying that the legislation would undermine "existing government-wide cybersecurity and records management policies." 

This article was updated July 7.

About the Author

Aisha Chowdhry is a former staff writer for FCW.


Featured

  • People
    Dr. Ronny Jackson briefs the press on President Trump

    Uncertainty at VA after nominee withdraws

    With White House physician Adm. Ronny Jackson's withdrawal, VA watchers are wondering what's next for the agency and its planned $16 billion health IT modernization project.

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.