How synced can (and should) NSA and CIA be on cyber?

world map

In the past year, the United States' two best-known intelligence agencies have undertaken ambitious reorganizations to better adapt to a hyper-digitized world.

The National Security Agency further integrated its Signals Intelligence and Information Assurance directorates while also establishing several new directorates covering research and acquisition, among other activities. The CIA created the Directorate for Digital Innovation (DDI) -- its first new directorate in over half a century -- to handle cyber operations and the agency's IT enterprise, among other tasks.

With those reorganizations still taking effect, FCW asked former CIA and NSA officials how the agencies should collaborate in cyberspace in pursuit of their missions.

David Shedd, a former CIA official who also served as acting director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said he would like to see the CIA, NSA and other intelligence agencies more closely coordinate their work in cyberspace.

For Shedd, that means integrating NSA's Threat Operations Center, which detects and helps mitigate cyberthreats, with CIA cyber operations, which are now handled by DDI.

"I just see the problem being so enormously big for our nation, that the more collaboration, the more integration that you can get," the better, he told FCW, while stressing that specific mission requirements should not get lost in that consolidation.

However, retired Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and NSA, said it is better to keep the two agencies' main cyber organizations at arm's length from each other. Drawing an analogy with traditional airspace, Hayden said NSA was the equivalent of the Air Force and the CIA's Information Operations Center (the cyber center that preceded DDI) was akin to Marine Corps aviation. In other words, they have distinct roles that should not be blended too much.

CIA Director John Brennan said recently that in establishing DDI, the CIA was not trying to replicate what NSA does.

"We do a lot of partnering with NSA, and we have benchmarked against them and FBI and others," Brennan said July 13 at the Brookings Institution. "And there are a fair amount of groups that are multi-agency in terms of their efforts. So as we grow, we need to take a fresh look at how the government cyber and digital-related entities are interoperating with one other."

Cultural differences pose challenges

President George W. Bush established the National Counterterrorism Center in 2004 to knock down the walls to intelligence sharing that the 2001 terrorist attacks made evident. In a similar vein, President Barack Obama ordered the creation of the Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center in February 2015 to connect the dots on cyberthreat intelligence.

CTIIC comprises specialists from NSA, the CIA, the FBI and other intelligence agencies. The center has a limit of 50 employees (NCTC is many times larger), and Director Tonya Ugoretz said in a recent interview that there are no plans to expand.

Shedd said he would like to see a much larger multi-agency cyber center that is commensurate with the threat. "I would argue that you would be better off before a big [cyber]attack comes to plan around an NCTC model," he said.

Absent an expansion of CTIIC, there are other avenues for the CIA and NSA to collaborate in cyberspace.

Chris Inglis, a former deputy director at NSA, said the CIA is now sending more of its employees to NSA to better understand how it approaches cyberspace. "That's a good thing," he said. "That creates familiarity; that creates an interaction and a mutual dependence that is needed."

"I think between [NSA Director Adm. Michael] Rogers and Brennan, there's a much stronger agreement to collaborate," Inglis added.

But cultural differences between the agencies might limit how much they can collaborate on some operations, he said. NSA officials often think about the trade-offs of deploying, say, a software exploit, while CIA officials' overriding concern might be the physical safety of operatives in the field.

"So that drives a different response in terms of the degree of the willingness to share," Inglis said. "I think culturally it's difficult to get over…. You'll never have them completely simpatico."

Although NSA's cyber capabilities get more attention, both Inglis and Hayden said the CIA has plenty of expertise, too, and the agency is more than capable of contributing to joint missions.

"I don't think they are that dramatic," Hayden said of the differences in the skills of the two agencies' cyber specialists. "What's dramatically different is the scale of resources that NSA puts into this kind of effort as opposed to what CIA puts into it."

Given the shifting digital landscape in which the two spy agencies operate, the CIA's and NSA's reorganizations could be anything but final. The transience of software and other IT building blocks suggests updates will be constantly needed.

About the Author

Sean Lyngaas is an FCW staff writer covering defense, cybersecurity and intelligence issues. Prior to joining FCW, he was a reporter and editor at Smart Grid Today, where he covered everything from cyber vulnerabilities in the U.S. electric grid to the national energy policies of Britain and Mexico. His reporting on a range of global issues has appeared in publications such as The Atlantic, The Economist, The Washington Diplomat and The Washington Post.

Lyngaas is an active member of the National Press Club, where he served as chairman of the Young Members Committee. He earned his M.A. in international affairs from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, and his B.A. in public policy from Duke University.

Click here for previous articles by Lyngaas, or connect with him on Twitter: @snlyngaas.


  • Cybersecurity
    secure network (bluebay/

    Federal CISO floats potential for new supply chain regs

    The federal government's top IT security chief and canvassed industry for feedback on how to shape new rules of the road for federal acquisition and procurement.

  • People
    DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, shown here at her Nov. 8, 2017, confirmation hearing. DHS Photo by Jetta Disco

    DHS chief Nielsen resigns

    Kirstjen Nielsen, the first Homeland Security secretary with a background in cybersecurity, is being replaced on an acting basis by the Customs and Border Protection chief. Her last day is April 10.

  • Management
    workflow (Urupong Phunkoed/

    House Dems oppose White House reorg plan

    The White House's proposal to reorganize and shutter the Office of Personnel Management hit a major snag, with House Oversight Democrats opposing any funding of the plan.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.