Drones

Congress hears from small biz on drone rules

Shutterstock image. Copyright: Ivan Cholakov

Small businesses are driving the demand for commercial drone aircraft in the U.S. The federal government has taken first steps in rolling out drone regulations, and industry representatives came to Capitol Hill this week to argue that those rules need to be refined.

"Small businesses have a particular interest in drone technology because not only are they users of drones, but also manufacturers," said Rep. Alma Adams (D-N.C.), ranking member of Committee on Small Business Subcommittee on Investigations, Oversight and Regulations, during a Sept. 27 hearing on the FAA's new rules for Unmanned Aerial Systems.

According to one drone expert on the panel, tens of thousands of commercial drone operators are out there.

"Of the more than 530,000 people who have registered their UAS with the FAA since last December," said Brian Wynne, president and CEO of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, "about 20,000 have indicated they are commercial operators." The FAA, he said, expects that more than half a million commercial drones could be flying in commercial applications in the next year.

The new FAA rules are a good first step, but the agency must keep up with galloping technological advances and be more responsive in real-time to operators, said Lisa Ellman, co-executive director of the Commercial Drone Alliance.

The agency's new regulations, for instance, shouldn't just be a burdensome replacement for its previous paperwork-intensive case-by-case waiver process, said Ellman, who is a partner at Hogan Lovells and a chair of the firm's Global Unmanned Aircraft Systems Group. It also shouldn't be tied to older aviation regulations. With the new UAS rules, she said, "the government has essentially bolted the new small UAS regulations onto the old manned aviation regulatory structure. Meanwhile, a five pound UAS has almost nothing in common with a large manned aircraft."

Ellman urged the FAA to take a fresh approach in how it thinks about unmanned aerial systems.

"With some creativity, we should have drafted a different set of rules for UAS and other small vehicles that do not cite and relate back to manned aircraft regulations," she said. Instead, the current rules "require companies to jump through legal hoops in order to obtain relief from those same manned aircraft regulations."

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a senior staff writer at FCW, whose beat focuses on acquisition, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Energy.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, tele.com magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at mrockwell@fcw.com or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.


Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.