DOD opts not to rush new R&D rules

Dale Ormond - DOD/SES/AT&L 

The Pentagon's Dale Ormond explained why the military is going slow on new R&D rules that are "raising a lot of angst" in industry.

Contractors may get a little extra time before the Department of Defense steps in for a closer look at their government funded, independent, technology research and development projects, according to a top DOD tech official.

The Pentagon rolled out Independent Research and Development requirements in April 2015 as a way to get an earlier look at developing technologies. The rules were part of the DOD's Better Buying Power  3.0 acquisition reform.

DOD contractors criticized the rules for potentially delving too deeply into their R&D efforts.

"IR&D is raising a lot of angst in industry," said Dale Ormond, principal director, research, in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering). DOD Undersecretary for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Frank Kendall "has directed that industry must discuss their IR&D projects with a knowledgeable person inside the department before they begin doing work," Ormond said at a Dec. 1 breakfast presentation in Washington sponsored by the National Defense Industrial Association.

According to a 2015 Pentagon white paper, "the objective of this engagement is to ensure that both IR&D performers and their potential DOD customers have sufficient awareness of each other’s efforts and to provide industry with some feedback on the relevance of proposed and completed IR&D work."

The rules were supposed to take effect Oct. 1.

"We're not exactly ready to do this yet," Ormond said. "We have a way to do it. We're putting out some information and it looks like Mr. Kendall will grant a little bit of relief to make this easier and not so burdensome. Expect something to come out in the next couple of days," he said.

The Pentagon didn't respond immediately to an FCW request for details concerning Kendall's move to lengthen the time frame for the IR&D rules.

"What he's trying to do increase the communications between industry and our laboratories in terms of what they're doing with ideas they're pursuing so that we can have greater opportunity to collaborate and make each other better," Ormond said in his presentation. "The intent is really to help stimulate more discussion and more innovative ideas. We'll see how it goes."

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a senior staff writer at FCW, whose beat focuses on acquisition, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Energy.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.