Comment

How to foster an innovation culture in government

Shutterstock image. Artist credit: pixbox77 

Government has midwifed technology from GPS to rocket ships to email. Government can innovate. But all too often lately, the pace of technological change accelerates far faster than change in government itself. When a citizen can order dinner with two thumb swipes, registering a business by waiting in leg-aching queues feels incredibly onerous.

To close the innovation gap between the public and private sector, governments may need to transition into "cognitive learning systems." It would be a radical change. A cognitive learning system is an organization that actively learns and adapts -- not under orders from above, but as a standard continuation of its process. The question is, if you left your agency leaderless, would its natural momentum drive it to improve?

Cognitive learning systems solicit regular feedback, so agile philosophies, which emphasize research, customer-centric design and prototyping, naturally compliment cognitive learning systems.

Agile methods drive some initiatives, like New Zealand municipalities surveying building contractors to identify the most painful steps in permitting. But we rarely see a cognitive redesign of an organization. That kind of transition would incorporate some core elements: open functionality, innovation from "the edges," embracing failure, re-skilling talent pools and simply sheltering critical voices. These strategies increase the flow of new ideas, which an organization can then evaluate, test and deploy.

Although government employees do innovate, those innvators represent a fraction of a nation's enormous pool of talent and energy. Prizes, challenges and crowdsourcing let governments participate in collaborative public-private ecosystems. The collective intelligence of thousands can identify solutions that one hard-working employee never would. We've seen a protein-folding game identify an enzyme critical to stopping HIV. Bug bounties and hackathons have found weaknesses in critical government code.

At a simple level, the U.S. government already has shown a big commitment to responding to user feedback. Much more can be done, however. To paraphrase Linus's Law, given enough eyeballs, all flaws can be improved.

Soliciting input from individuals doesn't replace observing unusual ecosystems. When an ancient ayurvedic cure for cholera in Bangladesh inspired a revolutionary treatment called Oral Rehydration Salts (a precursor to Gatorade), or when the U.S. government funded the expansion of a small NGO that showed impressive results with the homeless, that was the core meeting the edge.

In business terms, the core is the network of professionals and resources where power accumulates. The edge is where outsiders experiment to solve niche challenges. Young generations repurposing technology occupy an edge. Emerging economies, where people maximize the use of minimal resources, represent another. Maybe Floyd at customer service who keeps finding new ways to placate disgruntled citizens is an edge by himself. Knowledge flows can connect the resources at the core with innovation at the edge.

While it's strategic to collect ideas from outside, innovative organizations must change their culture internally. First, they must shed their fear of failure. Bureaucracies tend to punish failure, which is memorable, and reward mediocrity, which doesn't produce a metric you can pin to a file. But modern technology makes the cost of failure cheap, and the pace of redesign rapid. Prototypes, beta versions and A/B testing all risk failure in exchange for new discoveries. Innovative companies -- and governments -- build failure into their attitude: fail quickly if you must, learn, and move on to the next iteration.

Accepting failures even helps prevent larger ones. If employees know that they can kill a struggling project without damaging their careers, they are more likely to shut it down before it expands beyond them. Big disasters have blame to share, but it's preferable to stop a mistake when one poor soul owns it.

Changing a culture requires changing the people. Rather than replace an entire agency with engineers fluent in agile methodology, the UK's Department of Work and Pensions shuttled employees to six-week "digital boot camps." Employees learned concepts like user-centric design and agile development, as well as specific skills, like prototyping and wire-framing. That six weeks didn't produce experts, but it did produce "plumber's mates" -- apprentices who could hold their own.

Organizations can also nurture critical eyeballs with safe havens for low risk innovation. "Skunk works" with limited bureaucracy or test projects that don't count against manager's performance reviews can protect innovative ideas.

As technological progress accelerates, the possibilities for efficient, effective government expand. To meet their own potential, governments should reorganize around collecting and assessing new ideas. It only works if leaders keep an open mind, and free their charges from pressure to produce any specific result…except for what works.

About the Author

William D. Eggers is the Executive Director of the Deloitte Center for Government Insights and the author of nine books, including his latest, "Delivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technologies that are Transforming Government."

Nominate Today!

Nominations for the 2018 Federal 100 Awards are now being accepted, and are due by Dec. 23. 

Featured

Reader comments

Tue, Jan 24, 2017 Gwynne Washington, DC

Could not agree more! Would like a continuation of this discussion with examples of how to tap the Floyds. We did a lot of that type of work--identifying, abstracting and returning practices to the "wild." The edges are where innovation happens and it must be mined. Thanks for a good piece, Bill.

Fri, Jan 20, 2017 Mel Ostrow

The most important thing to remember is: the USG does not and does not want to buy a lot of innovation from contractors. Almost all services are bought to turn the crank--butts in seats, routine operations. Hardly anything new needs to be surfaced by hardly any contractors. Same for federal employees. Better to worry about whether the feds or contractors are 1. qualified 2 working and 3 productive and 4 record time and bill correctly. Those four little things can make Government Contractors great again.

Thu, Jan 19, 2017 Munish India

Very nice article , yes this is culture change which govt need to create to cop up with the technology and people. Govt can create small team as role model for these innovation as most of the employees are quite busy in their day to day work that they can not focus on these new area of work.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group