Workforce

Trump signs federal hiring freeze

President Donald J. Trump delivers his inaugural address 

In one of his first executive actions, President Donald Trump put a freeze on federal hiring and pay raises for federal employees.

Trump signed an executive memorandum in the Oval Office on Jan. 23 at an event that included Vice President Mike Pence, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and other top advisers to the new president.

In October 2016, the Trump campaign promised a freeze that would apply to civil service hiring at agencies with exceptions for the military, public safety and public health workers. The executive order sets up a 90-day review by the Office of Management and Budget, culminating in a "long-term plan to reduce the size of the federal government's workforce through attrition." The order will expire once that plan goes into effect.

Active-duty military personnel are specifically exempted under the order, which also allows the head of any department to make exceptions on the grounds of national security and/or public safety.

The freeze will not get in the way of plans to onboard political appointees – non-career Senior Executive Service posts and hires under Schedule C are exempted. The order also does not apply retroactively, and exceptions can be made to the freeze at the behest of the director of the Office of Personnel Management.

"I think what the president is showing through the hiring freeze first and foremost today is that we've to respect the American taxpayer," Press Secretary Sean Spicer said at a Jan. 23 White House briefing. "To see money get wasted in Washington on a job that is duplicative is insulting to the hard work that they do to pay their taxes."

Spicer added that agency landing teams were looking to find greater efficiencies and reduce duplication in the federal workforce.

The leader of the American Federation of Government Employees union slammed the move.

"This hiring freeze will mean longer lines at Social Security offices, fewer workplace safety inspections, less oversight of environmental polluters, and greater risk to our nation’s food supply and clean water systems," AFGE National President J. David Cox Sr. said in a statement.

Cox also complained that the move will drive agencies to hire more contractors to fill the gaps caused by the absence of agency workers. "President Trump’s federal hiring freeze will result in more government waste as agencies are forced to hire high-priced contractors to do the work that federal employees can and should be doing," he said.

Another union leader, Tony Reardon, national president of the National Treasury Employees Union, called the hiring freeze is "harmful and counterproductive." He added that, "our government depends upon highly-trained and experienced federal workers being able to carry on with their important work. This puts up a substantial roadblock for agencies."

Max Stier, CEO of the Partnership for Public Service, said, "Hiring freezes are the wrong way to achieve a laudable goal of making our government more effective for the American public. We believe the smarter course of action would be to reimagine and rebuild the systems and processes that make government work."

Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), whose district is home to many federal employees and contractors, complained that a hiring freeze "is a rather mindless approach to management," adding that it "discounts the criticality of particular missions."

And David Eagles, director of the Center for Presidential Transition at the Partnership for Public Service, told FCW that the Trump administration will be able to forge solid working relationships with career government employees at the policy-execution level despite the hiring freeze. The ability of the Trump administration to execute its policy will depend on whether the political team "will close the door on the career workforce or whether there is an aggressive plan to engage and align" the work of political appointees with the work of career federal employees.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is executive editor of FCW.

Before joining the editing team, Mazmanian was an FCW staff writer covering Congress, government-wide technology policy and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Prior to joining FCW, Mazmanian was technology correspondent for National Journal and served in a variety of editorial roles at B2B news service SmartBrief. Mazmanian has contributed reviews and articles to the Washington Post, the Washington City Paper, Newsday, New York Press, Architect Magazine and other publications.

Click here for previous articles by Mazmanian. Connect with him on Twitter at @thisismaz.


Cyber. Covered.

Government Cyber Insider tracks the technologies, policies, threats and emerging solutions that shape the cybersecurity landscape.

Featured

Reader comments

Wed, Jan 25, 2017 Jpf

Wow, a lot of people panicking for no reason. A 90 moratorium will not hurt ANY agency. You people complain about everything.

Wed, Jan 25, 2017

We must acknowledge as Americans that our national debt is growing out of control! Unfortunately for Civil Servants, this means we will have to endure hiring freezes, reduced number of employees, and cuts in budgets. The proactive way for government workers is to communicate with the incoming administration how the freeze will impact the programs and services that we perform. This way the onus will be on the administration and congress to focus funding goals and objectives in the most focused manner possible, which will benefit all.

Tue, Jan 24, 2017

The reason a $100 dollar bicycle costs the taxpayer $1,000 is Congressional regulations not employees. Acquisitions, administration, oversight, affirmative action, governance, accounting, and OMB regulations waste 90% of the cost of government. Don't eliminate the best workers just eliminate the regulators. No successful business pays their employees low wages with miserable work conditions. The best and brightest are leaving the government as a result of this thoughtless policy.

Tue, Jan 24, 2017

We just got out of a decade long hiring freeze and will be losing 40 percent of the workforce to retirement over the next 3-5 years. The past hiring freeze up to present day, has left a wide generation gap within departments. This has led to a scarcity of staff who are ready for positions of leadership while our institutional knowledge goes out the window. It will have have an impact on those in the Engineering and Technical fields. This is an ill timed freeze and will not aid in improving how government runs. According to OPM statististics, total government employment has decreased over time from what it was in 1962 yet population that the federal government serves has increased by 132.4 million. How much "doing more with less" can we possible do and still function? This has been the adage over my 29 year career.

Tue, Jan 24, 2017

Thought Trump was going to help but this is another prime example he hasn't a clue about the functionality and operations in the "real" world. The sooner he is out the better. He is just costing taxpayers more in the long run and he probably doesn't pay any taxes anyway because he seems to be afraid of releasing his returns.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group