Border reps see promise in biometrics

Shutterstock image biometric tech 

Biometric identification technologies could be a key tool not only for bolstering immigration security, but also to negotiate the stormy political landscape that surrounds a planned border wall.

"We're looking for ways to make the border work more efficiently, not shut it down," said Rep. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) in remarks at the Connect ID conference in Washington.

Peters, who sits on the House Science, Space and Technology Committee's technology subcommittee, said that biometric identification technology "is more cost-effective than a border wall."

Peters told FCW that some House Republicans want to discuss technology and the border wall, but the political environment prevents it. "I hope things will settle out politically by then."

The border wall project proposed by the Trump administration, according to Peters, is potentially a barrier to legitimate trade between the U.S. and Mexico. However, biometric security technology that can weed out "bad cargo" of humans, drugs and weapons can aid in trade processes, he said.

Biometric scanners at ports of entries that cost $10,000 per gate make more sense that spending billions on a wall, said Peters.

The leader of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) also sees biometric technology as a key to border security, as well as counter terrorism efforts.

Biometric technologies, he said in remarks at the same conference, are "key" to expanding visa entry-exit security programs and blocking terrorists from moving through the southern border and into the U.S. Foreign fighters returning from a failing terrorist caliphate in the Middle East could get Mexican drug cartels to smuggle them into the U.S., he said.

DHS programs that rely on biometric information, such as the Biometric Identification Transnational Migration Alert Program Project, said McCaul, have proven effective at tracking suspect individuals before they reach actual U.S. borders.

"McCaul is open to [biometric technology]," said Peters, whose presentation followed McCaul's. "He understands it."

That understanding, said Peters, could lead to a more productive discussion down the road on how the border wall proposed by Trump might evolve into a more technology-oriented effort. Peters said that discussion could take place after some of the political heat cools.

"This time next year we could talk about smart ways to use technology and work the problems in a more constructive way," he said.

Peters told FCW that some House Republicans want to discuss technology and the border wall, but the political environment prevents it. "I hope things will settle out politically by then."

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a senior staff writer at FCW, whose beat focuses on acquisition, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Energy.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.


  • Comment
    customer experience (garagestock/

    Leveraging the TMF to improve customer experience

    Focusing on customer experience as part of the Technology Modernization Fund investment strategy will enable agencies to improve service and build trust in government.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

Stay Connected