Oversight

IGs say hiring freeze, budget cuts hurt oversight

Shutterstock image: workforce organization chart.

Agency watchdogs said that the hiring freeze negatively affected their operations and raised concerns that the freeze, combined with proposed budget cuts, could jeopardize their ability to conduct effective oversight.

Democratic staff of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee surveyed IGs from two dozen agencies about the effects early actions by the Trump administration had on their oversight work.

“Nearly every” IG surveyed reported that the hiring freeze had a negative effect on operations; “many” expressed concerns about the impact of “inadequate staffing -- from the combination of the hiring freeze and proposed budget cuts,” staffers wrote in a letter to the Democratic committee members.

“Some IGs warned explicitly that their ability to detect and prevent waste, fraud and abuse within federal programs could be impaired … by President Trump’s hiring freeze and his proposed staffing reductions going forward,” the letter said. “For members of Congress seeking to ensure that federal agencies operate effectively and efficiently -- including Republicans -- reducing funding and staffing at IG offices will be counterproductive.”

The letter specifically includes concerns raised by IGs from the Departments of Treasury, State, Education, Interior, Transportation and Defense, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency.

Treasury’s IG said the freeze “will put Treasury at risk of increased fraud and other criminal activity,” while State’s IG reported that the agency faces staffing challenges in oversight of anti-terrorism efforts.

The “opportunity to have greater impact with oversight” on cybersecurity and other issues is “simply not possible at our current levels,” Interior’s IG said. EPA’s IG added that the proposed cuts could impair “our ability to exchange protective intelligence information” with law enforcement.

At DOD, the IG said the timely resolution of sexual assault complaints “will suffer” and that the Pentagon “may face limited or no audit oversight” over the $300 billion it spends annually in acquisition contracts.

In a statement announcing the fiscal year 2017 budget signing, President Donald Trump said of provisions that deny agency funds to impede IG access to records, “I will construe these … consistently with my authority to control the dissemination of information protected by executive privilege.”

This survey is not the first run-in Trump has had with IGs.

During the transition, Trump officials came under fire for threatening to oust agency watchdogs and suggesting that certain IGs’ positions were “temporary.” Soon after, the transition team reversed its initial position.

In April, Reps. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the House Oversight Committee chairman and ranking member, respectively, penned a letter to Trump asking his administration to pick up the pace on filling vacant IG posts.

About the Author

Chase Gunter is a former FCW staff writer.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.