DIUx gets a big boost in FY19 budget

The Pentagon (Photo by Ivan Cholakov / Shutterstock)

Funding for the Defense Department’s innovation arm could nearly triple in 2019.

The administration wants the Defense Innovation Unit Experimental to get $71 million for fiscal year 2019, up $41 million from 2018, DOD Comptroller David Norquist said during a Feb. 12 media briefing at the Pentagon on the proposed fiscal 2019 budget.

DOD has been increasingly leaning on DIUx to deliver futureproof capabilities, and the requested $71 million infusion for the unit backs those expectations. Congress, however, has been wary of DIUx’s trajectory, stymying previous investment requests.

For example, the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act limited DIUx’s access to available funds to 75 percent of its operational budget and 25 percent of its overall program budget. DIUx received $29.6 million in 2018. In fiscal 2017, Congress approved only $10 million for the experimental unit. (DIUx also receives indirect funding from venture capital firms and investments from its customers.)

Overall, the administration's budget proposal for DOD closely sticks to points of emphasis already made in the national defense and security strategies, directing funds toward readiness, modernization and innovation.

For 2019, DOD stands to get $686 billion, with another $30 billion going to other agencies’ defense spending. Of that, DOD has planned $92.4 billion or 14 percent to go towards research, development, testing and evaluation and $13.7 billion for initiatives involving hypersonics, integrated cyber operations, electronic warfare and artificial intelligence.

Cyber operations also would get an $8.6 billion infusion, which includes support for U.S. Cyber Command’s 133 cyber mission force teams as well as other efforts targeting personnel and training, Norquist said. The services get near-equal shares, with the Army claiming $183 billion, the Air Force at $194.2 billion and $194.1 billion for the Navy.

The DOD proposal shows 10 percent real growth -- $74 billion -- over the continuing resolution budgets the department has been operating on, according to the department’s summary. But it’s not quite enough, Norquist said.

While expressing great appreciation for the budget increase, he said the department was still in “the hole we’re crawling out of” with defense spending at historic lows.

“Over a five-year period, our forces have endured a $400 billion loss in readiness maintenance and modernization. With a bipartisan budget agreement, that hemorrhaging stops,” Norquist said. “It is a sign of how deep the hole is that we’re in that it takes this big of an increase just to get the department’s budget back to where inflation alone would have put us.”

About the Author

Lauren C. Williams is a staff writer at FCW covering defense and cybersecurity.

Prior to joining FCW, Williams was the tech reporter for ThinkProgress, where she covered everything from internet culture to national security issues. In past positions, Williams covered health care, politics and crime for various publications, including The Seattle Times.

Williams graduated with a master's in journalism from the University of Maryland, College Park and a bachelor's in dietetics from the University of Delaware. She can be contacted at, or follow her on Twitter @lalaurenista.

Click here for previous articles by Wiliams.


  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.