Warner seeks fix for clearance backlog

Sen. Mark Warner (Photo by Mark Reinstein/Shutterstock) 

The next defense spending bill could include reforms designed to chip away at the federal government's massive clearance backlog.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, introduced amendments to the Senate's version of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act that aim to solve the near 700,000-person clearance backlog through budget transparency and goal setting.

Warner's legislation would require departments and agencies to disclose the costs of background investigations and reinvestigations, screening mechanisms and the average cost per person.

The proposal also states that by December 2021, 90 percent of all security clearance determinations should be issued in less than 30 days for the secret level and 90 days for top secret. Reciprocity of security clearances at the same level for other federal departments and agencies would need to be recognized in less than two weeks. Additionally, the provision says periodic reinvestigations are not to be required for more than 10 percent of the clearance-holding population.

These are "much-needed fixes to streamline and modernize our outdated security clearance process," Warner said in a statement. "I look forward to working with my colleagues to ensure we provide the proper resources and support our military needs in this year's defense budget."

At a Senate hearing in March, Warner expressed deep frustration with the clearance backlog. He told witnesses that he wants to "completely rethink" the process, adding that it was not designed with the current threat landscape in mind in terms of risks posed by contractors and by insiders leaking to adversaries or the press.

Warner's amendments come ahead of promised changes to the clearance process, which were previewed by Bill Evanina, director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, in April. Changes include new guidance designed to streamline the award of an initial or interim clearance and the adoption of continuous monitoring technologies to evaluate risk of clearance holders in real time or near real time.

About the Author

Lauren C. Williams is senior editor for FCW and Defense Systems, covering defense and cybersecurity.

Prior to joining FCW, Williams was the tech reporter for ThinkProgress, where she covered everything from internet culture to national security issues. In past positions, Williams covered health care, politics and crime for various publications, including The Seattle Times.

Williams graduated with a master's in journalism from the University of Maryland, College Park and a bachelor's in dietetics from the University of Delaware. She can be contacted at [email protected], or follow her on Twitter @lalaurenista.

Click here for previous articles by Wiliams.


  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

Stay Connected