Thrift Board backs China investment over lawmakers' objections

financial technology (whiteMocca/ 

Despite criticism from multiple U.S. Senators, the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board affirmed a move to invest in an index fund that includes Chinese state-owned companies.

The board, which controls allocations of about $600 billion in federal retiree funds, voted to confirm a decision from two years earlier to shift the International Funds under its Thrift Savings Plan to the MSCI All Country World Ex-US Investable Market Index.

The board revisited the decision in the wake of a letter from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) to FRTIB Chairman Michael Kennedy on Aug. 26 urged the board to reconsider, citing that the decision to do so posed a threat to U.S. national and economy security, as the index included China-based companies close to the Chinese government and ruling Communist Party.

"The FRTIB's decision to track this MSCI index constitutes a decision to invest in…many firms that are involved in the Chinese Government’s military, espionage, human rights abuses," the senators wrote. "[It] therefore poses fundamental questions about the Board's statutory and fiduciary responsibilities to American public servants who invest in federal retirement plans." The letter also questioned the propriety of investing in China Mobile when that firm was recently barred by the Federal Communications Commission from sell gear to U.S. carriers for use in telecom infrastructure.

Rubio and Shaheen followed up with a second letter Oct. 22 that added Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Ut.), Kristen Gilibrand (D-N.Y.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.).

Members of the Board said at the meeting that they did not want to let outside political pressures effect how government employee and retiree investment funds were handled on their behalf.

"This issue of political issues affecting investments is something that comes back time and time again, particularly for a lot of unions," said Employee Thrift Advisory Council Vice-Chairman James W. Sauber. "Early on, I remember there was a lot of talk about excluding anyone who did business with South Africa. The consensus is pretty strong, that we shouldn’t let political issues effect any investment opportunities."

But that consensus may be a thing of the past according to Prof. Joanne Bauer, who teaches business and human rights law at Columbia and is co-founder of the RightsCoLab.

"Increasingly, companies are now understanding they have responsibilities to respect human rights, and most have a human rights policy statement to go with it," Bauer told FCW in an interview. "However, across government, it's surprising that there's no consistency, even with things like the United Nations' Guiding Principles [on Business and Human Rights]. There are three pillars, and one of them is the state duty to protect, and horizontal policy integration across all functions of government, because too often government decisions tend to get siloed."

Board member Dana K. Bilyeu indicated that FRTIB exists to serve its investors and not make policy, and that decisions about barring investment for human rights and security concerns is the province of the Office of Foreign Asset Control at the Treasury Department.

Congress is looking to change that. Rubio, Shaheen and Romney introduced the Taxpayers and Savers Protection (TSP) Act in order to ban the Board from investing in Chinese firms.

"Deliberately choosing to invest the retirement savings of hardworking Americans in state-owned and state-directed firms in China effectively funds the Communist Party's efforts to undermine our economic and national security," Romney told FCW in an e-mailed statement. "Congress must act now to prevent the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board from steering the retirement savings of our federal employees and military members into the hands of China's Communist Party."

About the Author

Lia Russell is a former staff writer and associate editor at FCW.


  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

Stay Connected