Federal HR offices have been slow to recover since 1990s downsizing, says MSPB

Modernized HR management image with hands 

Optional caption goes here. Optional caption goes here. Optional caption goes here. Optional caption goes here.

According to the Merit Systems Protection Board, federal agencies' human resources departments have struggled to recover since a major downsizing campaign in the 1990s.

The MSPB's Office of Policy and Evaluation published their findings in a research brief after interviewing federal HR personnel and experts and analyzing data from the Office of Personnel Management as well as the results of a questionnaire they sent out to Chief Human Capital Officers.

"HR staff levels have declined as a proportion of permanent full-time employment," the MSPB report authors wrote. "Over time, agencies have hired more HR specialists and fewer HR assistants."

Some of the cause may lie at the feet of a six-month campaign to overhaul the federal HR apparatus that began 25 years earlier.

In 1993, the federal government set up an interagency taskforce, the National Performance Review, in a bid to cut down on personnel costs, decentralize HR functions, eliminate red tape, and refocus attention on providing customer service.

As a result of those findings, OPM staffing and overall HR staffing levels dropped significantly 1993 and 1998, with some agency HR workforces being cut by as much as 40%," according to the MSPB brief.

As HR staffing levels dropped, the average number of federal employees serviced by individual HR employees rose from 40.8 in 1993 to 48.2 in 2018. At the same time,

plans for automation and other technologies to allow for individual HR employees to handle the larger load haven't panned out. The lack of HR assistants is felt keenly here by specialists who have rote processing work as part of their jobs.

"Many specialists said that they are now overwhelmed by lower-level tasks such as processing personnel actions and data entry," the report states. As a result, higher-grade HR managers tended to spend more time on activities that are "not strategic, even if they are necessary to hire and pay employees."

The impact has been less pronounced at large agencies such as the Defense Department and Department of Veterans Affairs, likely because there are fewer HR specialists there, and they are graded higher than they were in the 1990s.

About the Author

Lia Russell is a staff writer and associate editor at FCW covering the federal workforce. Before joining FCW, she worked as a freelance labor reporter in San Francisco for outlets such SF Weekly, The American Prospect and The Baffler. Russell graduated with a bachelor's degree from Bard College.

Contact Lia at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter at @LiaOffLeash.


  • innovation (Sergey Nivens/

    VA embraces procurement challenges at scale

    Steve Kelman applauds the Department of Veterans Affairs' ambitious attempt to move beyond one-off prize-based contests to combat veteran suicides more effectively.

  • big data AI health data

    Where did the ideas for shutdowns and social distancing come from?

    Steve Kelman offers another story about hero civil servants (and a good president).

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.