'Huawei ban' means contract modifications

shutterstock ID:  640599397 By kb-photodesign 

The General Services Administration is making headway on contractor compliance in implementing bans on certain proscribed Chinese telecommunications gear manufacturers, according to several of the agency's contract managers.

The rate of acceptance of contract supply chain protection modifications by over 10,000 of GSA's Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) contract holders was 81% as of the end of August, according to Jack Tekus, an analyst in the agency's MAS Program Management Office. GSA sent the thousands of contractors compliance modifications that had to be incorporated into their contracts for them to remain eligible for federal opportunities.

The modifications are a key part of GSA's effort to get contractors to comply with Part B of Section 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

During a Sept. 10 GSA-sponsored webinar, Tekus and other GSA contracting officials from the agency's IT, public building and leasing operations, explained some of the new requirements. The rules ban government contractors from using technology and services tied to Chinese equipment manufacturers that have been deemed cybersecurity threats by the U.S. government. Those companies include telecommunications gear-makers Huawei and ZTE, as well as video surveillance manufacturers Hikvision, Hytera Communications Corporation, Dahua Technology Company, as well as their subsidiaries and affiliates.

The provision goes beyond the use of the five companies' gear in federal contracts and extend to their use in any day-to-day operations, including domestic and overseas operations.

The Sept. 10 webinar put a finer point on some of the provisions in compliance, but also set others aside for further comment.

Maria Swaby, GSA's procurement ombudsman, told attendees that guidance on some important definitions of terms including "use," "subsidiaries," or "affiliates" is still not settled. Those terms are important pivot points for compliance with telecommunications services, since data and traffic can crisscross different carrier networks and facilities who might not be subject to the ban. Swaby said questions about those terms' definitions could be submitted to by Sept. 14.

About the Author

Mark Rockwell is a senior staff writer at FCW, whose beat focuses on acquisition, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Energy.

Before joining FCW, Rockwell was Washington correspondent for Government Security News, where he covered all aspects of homeland security from IT to detection dogs and border security. Over the last 25 years in Washington as a reporter, editor and correspondent, he has covered an increasingly wide array of high-tech issues for publications like Communications Week, Internet Week, Fiber Optics News, magazine and Wireless Week.

Rockwell received a Jesse H. Neal Award for his work covering telecommunications issues, and is a graduate of James Madison University.

Click here for previous articles by Rockwell. Contact him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter at @MRockwell4.


  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.