Defense

HASC chair flips spending debate to acquisition reform

DOD photo by Senior Airman Perry Aston  11th Wing Public Affairs 

As the Biden administration prepares its first budget, the Pentagon is likely facing intensifying pressure from Congress to implement acquisition and other reforms to stem defense spending.

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, singled out Republicans' call for at least a 3% topline defense budget increase for modernization, saying that "how you spend the money is what matters."

"Three to 5% on what?" Smith said during a virtual Brookings event on March 5. "How about we spend the next four or five years figuring out how to get more out of the money that we're spending so that we actually wind up with greater resources."

Smith said national defense policy is often correlated with easily quantifiable metrics, such as spending, but that debate over growth in real dollars glosses over how the money is being spent. Smith argued that reforms to defense procurement will make taxpayer money go farther.

"We have wasted a spectacular amount of money on weapons systems that either haven't worked at all or who have not lived up to their promise, our acquisition and procurement process over the last 20 years can only be described as a complete disaster," Smith said. "We can complain about the money that we wasted, but that's gone. What we have to make sure of is that we don't waste any more."

That means reforming defense acquisition and procurement. Smith's comments came after the committee announced a new acquisition-focused task force charged with looking at vulnerabilities and threats in the defense industry supply chain. Reps. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) and Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.) are leading the 90-day review that could be renewed.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Jack Reed echoed Smith's remarks in February, saying that everything put in the budget needs to be justified: "There are steps that every service can take to save resources and reinvest those resources...that's the first step, what can we generate internally."

For Smith, it really comes down to one thing, he said: "Let's just figure out what we need, buy it, and make it work."

About the Author

Lauren C. Williams is senior editor for FCW and Defense Systems, covering defense and cybersecurity.

Prior to joining FCW, Williams was the tech reporter for ThinkProgress, where she covered everything from internet culture to national security issues. In past positions, Williams covered health care, politics and crime for various publications, including The Seattle Times.

Williams graduated with a master's in journalism from the University of Maryland, College Park and a bachelor's in dietetics from the University of Delaware. She can be contacted at [email protected], or follow her on Twitter @lalaurenista.

Click here for previous articles by Wiliams.


Featured

  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

Stay Connected