Senate defense committee delays NDAA markup

U.S. Senator Jack Reed, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, from Rhode Island, speaks with senior leadership from Army Futures Command (AFC), and Austin, Texas area entrepreneurs at Army Applications Laboratory. Senator Reed toured facilities and met with leadership to learn about the AFC mission. (U.S. Army photo by Patrick Enright) 

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) visiting Army Futures Command in 2020. (U.S. Army photo by Patrick Enright)

The must-pass defense policy bill has hit a significant delay in the Senate, because the White House budget is still in progress.

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), chairman for the Senate Armed Services Committee, announced that the committee would delay marking up the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act due to "the uncertainty of the timing of the president's budget submission."

"The committee has made a difficult decision to delay the markup of the NDAA until July," Reed said April 29 during a hearing on worldwide intelligence threats.

Last year, the SASC completed its markup of the bill in early June. That July delay will make space for nomination hearings of presidential appointees, he said.

There are currently 23 defense nominations or intentions to nominate for Senate-confirmed positions, including combatant commanders. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley are also scheduled to testify in June.

"That leaves May to focus on hearings for civilian nominations," Reed said. "Getting these nominees confirmed as quickly as possible will require many hearings, including possible full committee hearings on Wednesday and so I ask everyone to be as patient and cooperative as possible while we perform this very necessary oversight duty."

The announcement comes after Reed's counterpart, Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) expressed concerns about the Biden administration's reticence to provide a budget and the potential for continuing resolutions in the new fiscal year.

"If we don't get the budget by a certain timeframe, we can't markup the appropriations bills and the defense bill," Smith said April 22. "There is [no] time to get through the legislative process if we don't get this thing before May 10 and that's all I can say."

About the Author

Lauren C. Williams is senior editor for FCW and Defense Systems, covering defense and cybersecurity.

Prior to joining FCW, Williams was the tech reporter for ThinkProgress, where she covered everything from internet culture to national security issues. In past positions, Williams covered health care, politics and crime for various publications, including The Seattle Times.

Williams graduated with a master's in journalism from the University of Maryland, College Park and a bachelor's in dietetics from the University of Delaware. She can be contacted at [email protected], or follow her on Twitter @lalaurenista.

Click here for previous articles by Wiliams.


  • FCW Perspectives
    remote workers (elenabsl/

    Post-pandemic IT leadership

    The rush to maximum telework did more than showcase the importance of IT -- it also forced them to rethink their own operations.

  • Management
    shutterstock image By enzozo; photo ID: 319763930

    Where does the TMF Board go from here?

    With a $1 billion cash infusion, relaxed repayment guidelines and a surge in proposals from federal agencies, questions have been raised about whether the board overseeing the Technology Modernization Fund has been scaled to cope with its newfound popularity.

Stay Connected