Digital Conflict

By Kevin Coleman

Blog archive

Identifying the source of cyber attacks

The U.S. Cyber Command has stated that it is developing a wide range of cyber weapons. These weapons will give cyber commanders a wide range of options when it comes to offensive and defensive retaliation.

The capabilities include tools that would allow U.S. cyber forces to deceive, deny, disrupt, degrade, and destroy information and information systems and more. All these capabilities are necessary, yet the biggest challenge Cyber Command, and the rest of those working in cybersecurity, cyberwarfare and intelligence face, is the ability to attribute acts of cyber aggression back to the real originating source.

In a recent cyberwarfare working group, I was involved in a conversation with several lawyers. They were all quick to point out the absence of case law that is frequently used for framing decisions, and retaliatory actions is basically nonexistent when it comes to the cyber domain. The debate continued about what evidence would be required and in what form the evidence would have to exist before military leaders or the White House would feel comfortable enough to initiate an aggressive response, whether cyber or conventional.

One individual felt the current state of attribution capabilities fell far short of what is needed before action to be taken. If that is true what should be done? Do we need to enhance our cyber intelligence collection capabilities?

Posted by Kevin Coleman on Nov 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM


Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    Shutterstock photo id 669226093 By Gorodenkoff

    The disinformation game

    The federal government is poised to bring new tools and strategies to bear in the fight against foreign-backed online disinformation campaigns, but how and when they choose to act could have ramifications on the U.S. political ecosystem.

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.