Gov Careers

By Phil Piemonte

Blog archive

If you didn't get that federal job, read this ...

Folks who have not landed federal jobs they’ve been after will not be surprised to hear that a report released yesterday by the Partnership for Public Service reveals that the “weakest link” in the federal hiring chain is the assessment of job applicants.

What, you may ask, are the other links? They are, in order, "workforce planning," "marketing and recruiting," then that weak link "candidate assessment," followed by "selection," and finally, “onboarding.”

The reason for the weakest link? There is more than one, including: limited resources and training, lack of collaboration among HR folks, and flawed IT. Amid all these complications, the report said, a lot of good candidates can fall through the cracks.

What’s more, the people in charge find it hard even to assess the assessment process, because the data they need to do so is not out there.

If you care to see the recommendations assembled by PPS and PDRI, an organizational psychology research and consulting firm that also contributed to the report, you can find them on the PPS Web site.

While none of this will make you frustrated jobseekers out there feel any better, at least now you know …


Posted by Phil Piemonte on Aug 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM


  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.