The Great Cookie Debate
The Web cookie and Web bug story seems to be making the rounds. Last week, I posted about other federal agencies that are also violating the no-cookie rule
An update: This story from the Free Government Information blog
that points to this AP story via ABCNews.com
White House Says Web Site Counts Visitors [AP via ABCNews.com, 12. 30.2005]
The White House said Friday its Web tracking technology is consistent with federal rules because it only counts the number of visitors anonymously and doesn't record personal information.
My colleague, Susan Miller, posts on FCW.com's other blog that this is much ado about nothing
and she points to a post on Jeff Jarvis's Buzz Machine
, who contends that "this is a nonstory born of ignorance and paranoia and now hype."
With all due respect, this is not
Furthermore, the E-Government Act does make allowances for cookies, according to the Center for Democracy and Technology's Ari Schwartz. I will re-post Schwartz's comments from my original post on this subject
I actually don't think that the current policy is overly onerous.
Agencies need only:
1) put a policy official in charge of cookies (this can be someone who is in charge of privacy, but it could also be a CIO or someone in the CIO's office) and
The fact is that agencies are not every other Web site. Agencies have higher standards. We all understand that. And if these things are only to track numbers of visits and visitors, why not at least disclose? What additional data do permanent cookies provide?
Posted by Christopher Dorobek on Jan 03, 2006 at 12:15 PM