FCW Insider

Blog archive

A high court ruling on whistle blowers

So the U.S. Supreme Court this week issued a decision that essentially pulls back options for public sector whistle blowers.

In a victory for the Bush administration, justices said the 20 million public employees do not have free-speech protections for what they say as part of their jobs.

Critics predicted the impact would be sweeping, from silencing police officers who fear retribution for reporting department corruption, to subduing federal employees who want to reveal problems with government hurricane preparedness or terrorist-related security.

Here is the WP story on the case and Here is WP federal page columnist Steve Barr wrote about the decision this week.

I have to say that I have not read the decision yet [.pdf]. Here are excerpts from AP via Yahoo News.

I will read the decision on my way to the Management of Change conference this weekend, but my gut reaction is that this is a very bad decision for good government. I'm somewhat surprised that the WP has done opined on this issue, but the LAT has this editorial on the matter this morning.

Not all speech is free [LAT, 6.2.2006]
If you're a government employee, the 1st Amendment shouldn't protect your official conduct.

SOME CIVIL LIBERTARIANS ARE denouncing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling Tuesday against a former Los Angeles prosecutor who says he was disciplined for speaking out against police misconduct. They may want to consider how they would feel if the same decision went against, say, a Bush administration official who was fired for saying that proponents of the president's immigration policy suppressed evidence that illegal immigrants increase crime and disease...

Any American has the right to spout off against the legalization of illegal immigrants. A member of an administration that takes a pro-legalization stance does not have the same right to second-guess that administration's views in the name of "whistle-blowing." Whatever one thinks of Ceballos' actions, the court was right not to blur the distinction between citizen speech and employee speech.

Posted by Christopher Dorobek on Jun 02, 2006 at 12:15 PM


  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.