FCW Insider

Blog archive

E-mail to the editor: More on the need for procurement people

Regarding my May 21 editorial, "Help acquisition workers," I got this e-mail from a DOD procurement person:

I agree with the intent of your editorial: We procurement people need more resources.

However, I believe that your article lost impact by referring to the "procurement workforce" and "acquisition workforce" as if they were interrelated. They are not.

The procurement workforce is a distinct subset of the acquisition workforce. Too often, the call to improve the plight of the acquisition workforce results in plus-ups for the requirements side of the house with little or no help for the procurement workforce.

If your intent is to help the procurement workforce, consistent use of "procurement workforce" or "contracting workforce" [as opposed to "acquisition workforce"] would be clearer.


It's an excellent point.

Posted by Christopher Dorobek on May 23, 2007 at 12:16 PM


Featured

  • Congress
    people and data (Lightspring/Shutterstock.com)

    Lawmaker pushes online verification to combat disinformation

    Mandatory ID checks for social media platforms could help fight propaganda, but experts worry about privacy tradeoffs.

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.