FCW Insider

Blog archive

E-mail to the editor: More on the need for procurement people

Regarding my May 21 editorial, "Help acquisition workers," I got this e-mail from a DOD procurement person:

I agree with the intent of your editorial: We procurement people need more resources.

However, I believe that your article lost impact by referring to the "procurement workforce" and "acquisition workforce" as if they were interrelated. They are not.

The procurement workforce is a distinct subset of the acquisition workforce. Too often, the call to improve the plight of the acquisition workforce results in plus-ups for the requirements side of the house with little or no help for the procurement workforce.

If your intent is to help the procurement workforce, consistent use of "procurement workforce" or "contracting workforce" [as opposed to "acquisition workforce"] would be clearer.


It's an excellent point.

Posted by Christopher Dorobek on May 23, 2007 at 12:16 PM


Featured

  • IT Modernization
    Eisenhower Executive Office Building (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

    OMB's user guide to the MGT Act

    The Office of Management and Budget is working on a rules-of-the-road document to cover how agencies can seek and use funds under the MGT Act.

  • global network (Pushish Images/Shutterstock.com)

    As others see us -- a few surprises

    A recent dinner with civil servants from Asia delivered some interesting insights, Steve Kelman writes.

  • FCW Perspectives
    cloud (Singkham/Shutterstock.com)

    A smarter approach to cloud

    Advances in cloud technology are shifting the focus toward choosing the right tool for the job and crafting solutions that truly modernize systems.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.