By Steve Kelman

Blog archive

Contractors doing contracting

At breakfast one morning at the acquisition research conference at the Naval Postgraduate School, I got asked by some senior DOD contracting officials what I thought about the growing use of contractors doing contracting work (that is, involved in awarding and managing contracts held by others), work that traditionally has been done by government employees.

I said the trend disturbed me, as the use of contractors came closer and closer to the line of decision-making about contract award and management. Sometimes, I feared, contractors did all the work, presented a "recommendation," and basically the action of civil servants was just to approve the recommendation. The more a situation was like that, the more I worried. I mentioned an analogy to my view of ethical constraints while I was in government -- if the line is at a certain place, you don't want to be right at the line, you want to be a large distance on the proper side of it.

What was more interesting than my opinion was their reaction. All three agreed they were worried by current trends, as contractors were in some places (though they said this was still not widespread in DOD) coming close to making decisions.

There are of course some times when the government has a brief need for some highly specialized knowledge that involves source selection, where it makes sense to bring in outsiders (although, in my view, this should generally be a non-profit such as a federally funded research and development corporation). Also, it makes sense to hire contractors for agencies such as FEMA that face surge demand for their services, rather than having excess in-house staff waiting around for an emergency.

One of the government people at breakfast noted that, even today, some forces in DOD argue that, with money tight, DOD needs to reduce "overhead" personnel, such as those in acquisition.

Readers, what are your experiences with this phenomenon of using contractors for contracting work? Where should we be going on this?

Posted by Steve Kelman on May 22, 2007 at 12:08 PM


Featured

  • Telecommunications
    Stock photo ID: 658810513 By asharkyu

    GSA extends EIS deadline to 2023

    Agencies are getting up to three more years on existing telecom contracts before having to shift to the $50 billion Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions vehicle.

  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image ID: 569172169 By Zenzen

    OMB looks to retrain feds to fill cyber needs

    The federal government is taking steps to fill high-demand, skills-gap positions in tech by retraining employees already working within agencies without a cyber or IT background.

  • Acquisition
    GSA Headquarters (Photo by Rena Schild/Shutterstock)

    GSA to consolidate multiple award schedules

    The General Services Administration plans to consolidate dozens of its buying schedules across product areas including IT and services to reduce duplication.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.