By Steve Kelman

Blog archive

The Lectern: Why the new Air Force RFP means trouble

To be honest, I haven't been following the latest twists and turns in the Air Force's tanker procurement. This program has been marred by repeated congressional interference and a bid protest on the previous procurement that, depending on your point of view, either showed the Air Force could do nothing right or (closer to my view) that bid protest lawyers can almost always find some errors in a complex procurement such that a world where big procurements are almost always protested is a recipe for disaster for the procurement system.

I did know that the Air Force had issued a new request for proposal and that the familiar passel of congressional supporters of Boeing and Northrop Grumman had made their familiar comments. However, not until I read a recent supplement on the aerospace industry in the Financial Times that I actually got a feel for the tanker acquisition strategy.

It was not good news.

According to the Financial Times, the RFP includes 373 mandatory requirements, all graded simply pass-fail. There is no "extra credit" for any features beyond the mandatory requirements. Although the article is not clear on this (and thus I may be misinterpreting the RFP), it might be that each mandatory requirement is actually given equal weight in scoring.

This approach reflects every nightmare that many of us have had about the impact of the bid protest environment and the fear industry on how we do procurement. To "protest-proof" the RFP, and protect itself from criticism, the Air Force has removed human judgment from the process, and stated that it is not willing to reward quality at all. All requirements are mandatory (no credit for coming up with something that is valuable but not mandatory). All grades are pass-fail -- sort of like a parody of the civil service system. This is the procurement equivalent of the old paint-by-numbers approach to teaching people to be artists, an approach more suited to the culture of Chairman Mao's China than to a high-tech Air Force.

This is not a recipe for a procurement system that delivers value to agencies or taxpayers. It should be a warning signal to Dan Gordon, Obama’s nominee for OFPP administrator, and the administration's procurement leadership of problems that need to be overcome.

Posted by Steve Kelman on Nov 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM


Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.