the lectern banner

By Steve Kelman

Blog archive

Does government reward innovation?

compass innovation

The culture of government in China, like the culture of that society in general, is quite punitive. "Punishment" is a common word. When something goes wrong, the instinct is often to arrest somebody first and ask questions later. Subordinates fear and bow to bosses in a way that reminds one of Western organizations from a century ago or more.

So it was with considerable surprise that I read an article in Hong Kong's South China Morning Post while in China recently, discussing newly announced efforts in Shanghai – a previous pacemaker in China whose local economy is now somewhat faltering – to encourage reforms in local government policy and management by stopping the punishment of well-intentioned innovations that fail.

According to the article, the city government, in announcing plans "to encourage local officials to 'reform and innovate,'" stated that it "promised not to punish those who dare to try new ideas but may not achieve their objectives – so long as their efforts are made in good faith and don't lead to windfall gains for those officials." (The latter caveat takes into account China's huge corruption problem.) The policy also said that "the city will reward officials at various levels who show initiative for innovative ideas even if their reforms fail to meet targets."

Innovation is important for government. Government often underperforms. If that's true, then we can't continue to do business the same way – we need innovations to improve performance. And valuable innovations often yield huge performance or cost savings returns.

Yet that doesn't mean anything labeled "innovation" is a good idea. Indeed, most innovations fail. It is often hard to predict which innovations are going to work, so in practice if you want successes, you must be willing to tolerate failures.

But that creates the problem for government. Ideally, you want to make it easy to try out an innovation on a small scale, stop it quickly if it's not working, and scale up if it does work. However, if people get slapped in the face every time an innovative idea fails, they are going to get slapped a lot – a problem that becomes even worse when there are few rewards for success. Government folks quickly get the message: Innovations will bring you trouble when they fail , and don't get you anything when they succeed. The Shanghai city government policy is thus designed partly to counteract one of the great impediments to innovation in government.

Needless to say, the problem is also one we also very much have in the United States. It's embarrassing that this is coming from a large local government in China rather than the U.S. government.

It is really a challenge to bring about a culture change here. How does one avoid feeding media stories about government officials being praised or rewarded for failing? One can almost hear the cries of "where's the accountability?" And, from a managerial perspective, how does one balance the desire to make room for innovations and their potential for failure with an expectation for high performance?

But the right answer can't be the dramatic underproduction of innovations that the current incentive structure in government produces. That's why the Shanghai effort should be welcomed – it will be interesting to see if anything comes of it.

Posted on Jun 07, 2013 at 12:09 PM

Nominate Today!

Nominations for the 2018 Federal 100 Awards are now being accepted, and are due by Dec. 23. 


Reader comments

Tue, Jun 11, 2013

I agree with everything you write here with the caveat that not every idea is scalable. For example, any Israeli airport security technique that involves highly qualified personnel is unlikely to be successful here in the States because its hard to find good people in the quantity necessary.

Sun, Jun 9, 2013 Marvin Sirbu Pittsburgh

Randy Pausch (of "Last Lecture" fame) used to give a Penguin Award in his classes for the project team that took the biggest risk--whether or not they succeeded. The award is so named because penguins will congregate at the edge of the ice hesitant to jump in for fear of predators in the water, until one penguin takes a risk and dives in. The Randy Pausch Bridge on the CMU campus is decorated with a penguin theme.

Sat, Jun 8, 2013 May

if you go to Ashe Institutes local innovations site, you will see China's local governments have been innovating. What you mention is nothing new. Furthermore scaling up policies that work is the Chinese norm.

Sat, Jun 8, 2013 Bruce Waltuck

And see David Dave Snowden's work with the Cynefin framework. Dealing with complex challenges, we can not assure results, or reliably predict causality prospectively. The best we can do (after we stop pretending control is possible), is to try "safe to fail" experiments of promising ideas. Keep and amplify what works. Dampen and stop what doesn't work.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group