By Steve Kelman

Blog archive

The pitfalls of public-private partnerships


I promised in a recent post that I would write a few blogs about potentials and pitfalls in different kinds of public-private partnership, and here's the first.

There was a fascinating story recently in Beijing Review about an effort by a newly established not-for-profit to organize carpools in one district of the city in an attempt to contribute to  efforts to ease traffic congestion.  Anyone who has spent time in Beijing is certainly aware of the city's traffic nightmare – endless bumper-to-bumper car traffic and subway trains that (at virtually all hours of the day, not just rush hour) would probably make the animals in cattle cars feel like they have plenty of breathing space. Cars are also the second-largest source of the air pollution that is making residents' lives miserable and almost certainly killing large numbers of them prematurely.

A citizen named Yong Wang started a non-profit called the Free Ride Charity Foundation to pay the highway toll (a little less than a dollar) of cars that take two riders. He raised money to pay the tolls and to erect 10 billboards about the program. He also recruited volunteers to distribute leaflets and to stand at highway entrances. In a country where for a long time people were encouraged to rely on the government to deal with problems, and where the government itself is somewhat suspicious of citizen organization efforts outside of official structures, The Free Ride Foundation represents an interesting kind of public-private partnership.

The article reported that the effort has met with some success, but has also encountered problems involving lack of citizen social trust and government over-regulation. When volunteers first started handing out flyers advertising the program, many drivers scorned them, thinking they were yet another one of the ubiquitous commercial leaflet distributors trying to push some product. Many people worry about their personal safety when riding with strangers. In terms of laws and regulations, the legal liability of the driver in case of an accident is unclear, and it is possible that the driver might have to compensate a passenger injured through the driver's fault, even if the passenger was participating in this free ride program. And a city official was quoted in the article about the possibility that the carpoolers might be running an illegal taxi service.

This experience shows elements of both the potentials and pitfalls of this kind of public-private partnership. The civic engagement in public problems that the Free Ride Foundation represents is really attractive – especially in a country such as China, where these traditions have been weak or weakened for a long time. And the effort, if successful, could even make a contribution to the lack of social trust that is one of the barriers to getting more take-up. But those seeking to begin such innovative efforts need to pay the same kind of attention to issues of management and implementation that (as illustrated by my recent blog post on Obamacare) often get ignored in government as well.

Posted on Nov 13, 2013 at 5:18 AM


  • Workforce
    White House rainbow light shutterstock ID : 1130423963 By zhephotography

    White House rolls out DEIA strategy

    On Tuesday, the Biden administration issued agencies a roadmap to guide their efforts to develop strategic plans for diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility (DEIA), as required under a as required under a June executive order.

  • Defense
    software (whiteMocca/

    Why DOD is so bad at buying software

    The Defense Department wants to acquire emerging technology faster and more efficiently. But will its latest attempts to streamline its processes be enough?

Stay Connected